Saturday, September 22, 2012





FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                                 by wp

Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Admits Obama’s Blackness Trumps His Failed Record

Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Admits Obama’s Blackness Trumps His Failed Record The Congressional Black Caucus was formed in 1971 to advocate on behalf of black Americans and hold lawmakers and the President of the United States accountable for policies adversely impacting blacks. The CBC is often referred to as the “conscience of the Congress.”
Considering the caucus’ history, it’s shocking CBC Chairman Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver admitted to the Root the CBC has been reluctant to criticize President Obama because he’s black. Never mind black unemployment under Obama for the past three years has been nearly double the national average and hit a record high of 16% in 2011. Black unemployment hasn’t been that high since 1984. I guess Cleaver also isn’t concerned black wealth has also plummeted under Obama. According to Pew Research Center, the average black family’s wealth is about $5,600 compared with $113,000 for whites.
According to Cleaver, “pride” about the president’s blackness trumps any concerns over current 14% black unemployment for members of the CBC. Cleaver said “if we had a white president we'd be marching around the White House.”
As the CBC celebrates their annual Legislative Conference this week in DC, it’s more than insulting that Rep. Cleaver can chuckle about the CBC giving Obama a pass on accountability for his failed agenda with blacks and all Americans. Cleaver’s glib reaction is particularly disturbing when you consider in 1970 the Democratic Select Committee, which later became the CBC, was outraged by President Richard Nixon’s refusal to meet with them. Nixon’s snub appeared to be the impetus for group’s name change a year later.
In 1971, the CBC boycotted Nixon’s State of the Union because he refused to meet with them and sent him a list of 60 policy recommendations, the link to which has been conspicuously removed from the CBC website. At least a year ago or two ago it was there. Perhaps Cleaver removed it because he didn’t want people asking why the CBC isn’t treating Obama with the same outrage.
After all, Obama refused to meet with the CBC until a full year in office even though 95% of blacks voted for him in 2008. That doesn’t seem to be the appropriate way to thank your most loyal voting bloc. Adding insult to injury, Obama spoke at last year’s CBC’s annual legislative conference and told blacks they were lazy and needed to look for jobs.
"Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes. "Shake it off. Stop complainin'. Stop grumblin'. Stop cryin.”
Cleaver joked with the Root when asked what he would do if Hillary Clinton had won the presidency in 2008 and the jobless numbers for blacks were this bad. “As much as I love Sen. Clinton I would have been all over her on 14 percent unemployment for African Americans. I would have said, "My sister, I love you, but this has got to go."
Apparently being America’s first black president has its benefits. It means the raging high unemployment and diminished wealth for blacks under Obama’s presidency ain't nothing but a thing to members of the CBC. The conscience of the Congress seems to have lost its way and sold his soul down the river in the name of giving deference to a brother named Barack Obama




FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                         by wp

America at a Precipice, Freedom at Risk

America at a Precipice, Freedom at RiskAmerica stands at a precipice. Never before have so many of our fundamental, God-given freedoms hung by so thin a thread here at home as they do now.
This generation—you and I, our neighbors and co-workers, our families and friends—will soon decide on many fronts whether or not this great experiment in freedom continues or crumbles. We will decide if we keep our Republic.
We’ve all witnessed the dramatic events that began last week on the anniversary of Sept. 11th, when terrorists invaded our sovereign territory, burned it, and killed the US diplomatic team.
And we’ve also seen how certain members of our government responded to this atrocity: namely, by putting our First Amendment on trial.
This is not out of character for the Left – this is how they operate.
For years, American citizens and American traditions have come out on the short end of the stick when the Left steps in to be sure no crisis goes to waste. All it takes is for a “victim” from a favored group to complain about an offense real or imagined, and the anti-freedom Left jumps into action. And when they do, the first thing on the chopping block is always free speech and the free exercise of religious faith and conscience.
And while the events surrounding the September 11th anniversary were glaring examples of this, we cannot overlook that fact that there are smaller, daily erosions of our liberty that are happening all the time but going unreported.
For example, the same Left that is limiting free speech to protect the public’s “religious feelings” is also infiltrating professional organizations and the education systems that control the destinies of so many Americans. From those lofty perches they will enforce their ideology with such aggression that mere disagreement leads to banishment from the profession or expulsion from the schools.
They create quasi-government courts with noble sounding names like the “Human Rights Commission,” then use these bodies to drive people of faith from the marketplace or impose heavy penalties on those who choose to stay and fight. They come down especially hard on those who dare remain convinced of the Constitutionally-protected freedoms of religion and of speech.
Both the glaring attacks and the more subtle ones have one thing in common—they are all alike used to chip away at our freedoms and bring us into compliance with the ideology of a Left that has staked its claim on America’s failure.
We stand at a precipice. And this great country, through which God has given us so much, now teeters on the edge of a dark future in which freedom is a distant memory.
We cannot allow this to happen. For if we lose the God-given freedoms our Founders passed on to us, we lose America.
It is imperative that we fulfill our civic responsibility and vote this November.


FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                               by wp

American Dream On

American Dream On"I expect to be judged by results ... If stuff hasn't worked and people don't feel like I've led the country in the right direction, then you'll have a new president."
Barack Obama may regret saying this comment in a stimulus pep rally in 2009.
After hearing from numerous independents and Democrats from swing states, all of whom are enormously disappointed in Obama's first term, "Can we go through another four years of this?" is the question that the new documentary "The Hope and Change" ends on. What could America look like after another term of squandered economic opportunities and leadership driven by radical ideology contrary to the much-celebrated promises of unity he rode into office on?
It's a tragic story -- of people who put their hopes and dreams in political rhetoric and were left not just disappointed, but despondent.
"You know there is something wrong with the kind of job he has done as president when the best feeling you had was the day you voted for him," is how Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney summed it up during his speech at the Republican convention.
"When it comes to strengthening the middle class and enabling upward mobility, President Obama's policies have failed," Romney has subsequently said.
For the last week, the media has focused on a surreptitiously taped video from a Romney fundraising event where the candidate attempted to explain -- admittedly inarticulately -- who would realistically consider him in November. He's been accused of aloofness to the struggles of a large segment of the country; he's being accused of the problem he seeks to solve.
"The Hope and Change," which is running on a number cable and broadcast networks in some states through Election Day, tells the story of Americans who have stopped dreaming, the "5 to 6 or 7 percent" who Romney explained in those taped remarks that his campaign needs to connect with. They are voters who realize that a lack of "due diligence" elected Obama; the "euphoria" has stopped, leaving them stranded in an unpleasant reality.
As Chad, a Democrat from Colorado, explains: "If I would have just met my wife 15 years earlier at that point in time, I was making enough money. I would have had the time and the money, she would not had to have worked, she could have spent all her time if she wanted to with our kids. I would have been able to do the weekend thing, the whole backyard-barbecue American dream. But you don't get that anymore. And instead, you fight and struggle.
Romney has promised to help families like Chad's. At the convention, he provided an important philosophical background: "All the laws and legislation in the world will never heal this world like the loving hearts and arms of mothers and fathers. If every child could drift to sleep feeling wrapped in the love of their family -- and God's love -- this world would be a far more gentle and better place."
Helping create an environment where families can flourish, this is at the heart of public service. This is what a president and a Congress can make happen.
I had all of this in mind while at a dinner celebrating -- and raising funds for -- the Consortium of Catholic Academies, some of the poorest schools in the poorest areas of Washington, D.C. (These are schools, by the way, whose existence is threatened by the president's health-insurance mandate.) "My dad's from Nigeria; he came to this country seeking a better future for this family," Obi Mbanefo told the audience. A sophomore at Gonzaga high school, Mbanefo wants to go to Ohio State or Princeton.
Mr. Mbanefo got a solid education because of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program that the president had to be arm-twisted by Speaker of the House John Boehner and outgoing Senator Joseph Lieberman into reauthorizing, despite its bipartisan support. But it's the dreams of Mbanefo's father and voters like Chad that are at stake in this election.


FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                           by wp

U.S. Government Celebrates Terrorist Who Craved to Nuke the U.S.

U.S. Government Celebrates Terrorist Who Craved to Nuke the U.S.Last week the Environmental Protection Agency kicked-off its celebration of “Hispanic Heritage Month” with an e-mail message featuring Che Guevara along with his famous slogan, “Hasta la Victoria Siempre.”
Let’s hope these U.S. civil servants were innocently unaware of some of Che Guevara’s other slogans:
* “The U.S. is the great enemy of mankind!”
* “Against those hyenas [Americans] there is no option but extermination!”
*” We will bring the war to the imperialist enemies’ very home, to his places of work and recreation. The imperialist enemy must feel like a hunted animal wherever he moves. Thus we’ll destroy him! (the U.S.)
* “We must keep our hatred [against the U.S.] alive and fan it to paroxysm!”
* “If the nuclear missiles had remained (in Cuba) we would have fired them against the heart of the U.S. including New York City. The victory of socialism is well worth millions of atomic victims!”
(Full documentation for all of the above here.)
U.S. taxpayers pay U.S. government employees to celebrate the author of the charming sentiments above. Fine. As usual only a few Americans of Cuban heritage have complained about the EPA’s “gaffe.” As usual, most of the people Che Guevara craved to incinerate view this EPA “gaffe” as silly obsession by hyper-sensitive and loudmouthed Cuban-Americans.
But Che Guevara’s hate-obsession was actually the U.S. Most of the defenseless Cubans he murdered in cold blood, he murdered because he thought they were affiliated with the U.S. (“U.S.–Backed” Batista, the CIA, etc.) In fact probably 90 per cent of the men (and boys, and some women) his regime murdered had no affiliation with Batista whatsoever and most had fought the Batista regime—but alas, as non-communists.
Since the U.S. government insists on these ethnic celebrations here’s an idea: Instead of celebrating a foreign “Hispanic” who dreamed of incinerating and entombing millions of U.S. citizens and obliterating the U.S. as a political entity, why not celebrate a U.S. citizen of Hispanic heritage who voluntarily put his life repeatedly on the line to defend the U.S.! Better still, this American of Hispanic heritage played a key role in capturing the foreign Hispanic who craved to murder millions of Americans!
EPA, meet Felix Rodriguez. Some background:
As a 19 year-old volunteer for Brigada 2506 (the Bay of Pigs freedom-fighters) Cuban-born Felix Rodriguez infiltrated Communist Cuba weeks before what came to be known as the Bay of Pigs invasion, organizing underground freedom-fighters, planning the sabotage of key roads and bridges, staying a step ahead of the Castro’s secret police and their KGB coaches. Almost half of his Band-of-Brothers in the infiltration teams died in front of Soviet-armed firing squads, after KGB-tutored torture. Felix knew the odds. He volunteered anyway, along with hundreds of other young Cuban exiles of the time.
After the Knights of Camelot stabbed the Bay of Pigs freedom-fighters in the back on the bloody Bay of Pigs beachhead, Rodriguez again foiled the Communist dragnet by slipping into the Venezuelan embassy and escaping a year later to Florida. After the Knights of Camelot stabbed the freedom-fighters again and twisted the blade with the Kennedy-Khrushchev swindle (that pledged the U.S. to protect Castro’s Soviet beachhead) Rodriguez, along with hundreds of his Bay of Pigs Band of Brothers enlisted in the U.S. Army.
On the day he gained his U.S. citizenship in 1969 Rodriguez celebrated the honor by volunteering for combat in Viet-Nam. "I lost the country of my birth to Communism,” he explained. "I know freedom must be protected. And I feel I owe it to my adopted country."
Felix flew over 300 helicopter combat missions in Viet-Nam, and was shot down five times. He won the coveted Intelligence Star for Valor from the CIA and nine Crosses for Gallantry from the Republic of South Vietnam. Later he battled Communists in El Salvador using a helicopter "mobile strike unit" scheme he developed in Viet-Nam. He flew over 100 combat missions in Central America, captured the FMLF's top commander and helped crush those Communist- terrorists decisively. All this was volunteer work.
Later, as a CIA operative, Rodriguez played a key role in tracking down and capturing Che Guevara in Bolivia and was the last to question him. “Finally I was face to face with the assassin of thousands of my countrymen, of hundreds of my patriot friends,” he recalls. But his mission was trying to save Che’s life, to transport him to the Southern Command in Panama for questioning.
Alas, Felix’s Bolivian allies viewed the matter differently. And it was, after all, their nation under Communist attack. So they decided on a policy that has since become a favorite among Americans who encounter (so-called) endangered species on their property: "Shoot, shovel, and shut-up."
Castro really wants Felix Rodriguez’ head and has sent hit-team, after hit-team, after hit-team (including one lent to him by his late chum Yasser Arafat) to murder Felix and his family in Florida. In May 1975 General Joaquin Zenteno, a Bolivian officer who worked with Rodriguez on Che’s capture, was murdered on a Paris street.
“You’re next,” heard Felix Rodriguez when he picked up the phone a few days later. “Click”
“When you get to Miami,” Cuban political prisoner Roberto Martin-Perez heard from one of his jailers the day of his release in 1987, “tell your friend Felix Rodriguez his days are numbered. It’s one of Fidel's top priorities.”
But Felix Rodriguez has foiled all of Castro’s murder plots against him, and until last year served as the proud President of The Bay of Pigs Veterans Association.


FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                   by wp

Israel is America's Shield

Israel is America's ShieldEditor's Note: This column was coauthored by Bob Morrison. We are used to hearing that America defends Israel. President Obama assures Israel that he has their back. That may be convincing talk in the `hood, but it rings hollow from this invertebrate administration to talk about anyone's back. Actually, we may have all that backward. It may well be that Israel that is defending us. Israel may yet prove America's Shield. All the usual chin-pullers and deep thinkers are warning of the parade of horribles that will descend on the world if Israel strikes Iran to prevent the mullahs from getting nuclear weapons. Why, says Georgetown University think tanker Anthony Cordesman, "a strike by Israel will give rise to regional instability and conflict as well as terrorism." What else, Dr. Cordesman, do we see daily in that region? Our TV sets seem to have "Mideast Turmoil" painted on their screens. Instability? Where is the stability? Conflict? What else does the region export but conflict? Terrorism? Sen. John McCain tries to assure us that the young Egyptians in Tahrir Square all idolize Mark Zuckerberg. The truth is Mark Zuckerberg, or anyone else who is Jewish, could not last a day in Tahrir Square today. We have been fed a line of rubbish by the talking heads and Mideast "experts" for twenty years. Let's start with legitimizing the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). The idea that Yasser Arafat or Mahmoud Abbas could ever reform and behave like true democrats was always an illusion. They are terrorists plain and simple. Arafat even invented airline hijacking for terror purposes. It did not matter that he got a Nobel Peace Prize, or that he was welcomed to the White House by Bill Clinton. He was always a mass murderer. And the Saudis? They are our special friends, are they not? President Obama even bowed to the Saudi King Abdullah in London. Well, we can find evidence of their friendship in the official 9/11 Commission Report. There on page 122 we learn that then-Vice President Al Gore went to Saudi Arabia in 1998 to ask then-Crown Prince Abdullah for access to Madani al-Tayyib. The Saudis were holding this finance director for al Qaeda and we wanted to talk to him. Madani al-Tayyib was said to have been the key figure who had to approve every al Qaeda expenditure over $1,000. The report deadpans the next line. The United States never obtained access to Tayyib. This man might have unraveled the entire attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, if only our friends the Saudis had let us at him. They declined. With friends like the Saudis, who needs enemies? Instead of more of this tripe from experts who should long ago have been discredited and disregarded, we recommend reading Columnist David P. Goldman in Asia Times. Writing as "Spengler" Goldman lays out the case for what will happen if Israel does not strike the Iranians. It is a far more realistic and compelling picture than the "save Mideast stability" crowd offers. Goldman warns that without an Israeli strike, we will likely see:
A nuclear-armed Iran;
Iraq's continued drift towards alliance with Iran; An overtly hostile regime in Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood government will lean on jihadist elements to divert attention from the country's economic collapse; An Egyptian war with Libya for oil and with Sudan for water; A radical Sunni regime controlling most of Syria, facing off an Iran-allied Alawistan ensconced in the coastal mountains; A de facto or de jure Muslim Brotherhood takeover of the Kingdom of Jordan; A campaign of subversion against the Saudi monarchy by Iran through Shi'ites in Eastern Province and by the Muslim Brotherhood internally; A weakened and perhaps imploding Turkey struggling with its Kurdish population and the emergence of Syrian Kurds as a wild card; A Taliban-dominated Afghanistan; and Radicalized Islamic regimes in Libya and Tunisia. Suddenly, the case for Israeli action begins to look a lot more persuasive than the tired old "stability" arguments. Goldman writes that Israeli action may actually slow America's slide into impotence. Whoever wins the presidential election here, it seems no military action against Iran by the U.S. would be possible in the next 4-6 months, and by then it could be too late. Once before, from May to August 1940, America's fate was being decided "over there." In the Cabinet War Rooms in London during those fateful days, Winston Churchill made the decision not to negotiate with mass murderers, not to give in. Despite being bombed on a daily basis, Churchill and his War Cabinet colleagues stood firm--and in that process, this Dreadnought Democracy was America's Shield. Churchill's courage protected us, too. Before Osama bin Laden ever dreamed of flaming towers collapsing in Manhattan, Adolf Hitler dreamed the same dream. He even took steps to equip Nazi suicide bombers, to bring about the destruction of what he then regarded as a Jewish Citadel. We can thank God that Winston Churchill stood between Hitler and us. And we will thank God if Benjamin Netanyahu does the same thing for us now. Don't wait, Israel: Shield America. Strike Iran's nuclear weapons program before it's too late for all of us.


FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                           by wp

Unions Tell Taxpayers: “We have no confidence in you.”

All over the country, union leaders are demanding that communities cough up extra cash to help “make teachers whole.” And unions around the country are testing the waters with teachers by asking teachers in budget stricken districts to vote “no confidence” in the community to send a message to taxpayers to cough up cash or else.
The “or else?”
Never mind making communities whole; those communities can never be whole under Obama.
As cash-strapped municipalities deal with declining tax revenues and too-rosy assumptions made by administrators and union officials, teachers unions are stamping their feet, holding their breath and mouthing the political equivalent of “La, la, la, I can’t hear you.”
In Palm Beach County, the teachers union is demanding $70 million dollars in raises for teachers at a time when the district has to hire more new teachers just to comply with state-mandated classroom sizes.

“There must be a plan in place to have a light at the end of the tunnel,” said Brian Phillips, the chief negotiator for the Classroom Teachers Association. “Is the board really interested in putting teachers back where they need to be?”
Perhaps they are. But the more vital question is can taxpayers afford it?
“It isn’t a lack of wanting to,” said the districts’ negotiator Van Ludy, “It’s a lack of being able to.”
And not just that either. For years public education has been in crisis in this county. Test scores are falling in the U.S. compared to other nations. At the K-12 level we are graduating fewer students ready for college. Around 77 percent of students who take ACT test aren’t “college ready” according to ACT.
Yet in district after district, budgets are being busted by union benefits that have been bankrolled by union campaign contribution taken out of your tax dollars.
Since 1992, the American Federation of Teachers of has given $30 million in campaign contributions to Democrats, who essentially run the education bureaucracy in the country, while donating less than $300,000 to Republicans
That’s why in Democrat-controlled Chicago, teachers went on strike after the district offered them a whopping 16 percent raise over four years. The union demanded 30 percent.
Teachers in Chicago already make an average salary of $76,000, reports the CBS local news affiliate, while New York City teachers average $73,000.
“Working conditions are part of everyone’s job,” says Chicago Teachers Union attorney Robert Bloch told CBS2 Chicago, “we all think about working conditions.”
But apparently not test scores.
Only 21 percent of Chicago Public School 8th graders are proficient in reading and only 20 percent scored at grade level in mathematics, according to the U.S. Department of Education.
Chicago lags the national public school average, which lags the international average of industrialized nations, 224 to 240 or 16 points on a 500 point scale. Even Washington DC’s disreputable school system out-performs Chicago in teaching math. The scores for the respective cities are tied for reading.
In Chicago, the teachers strike was preceded, as it has been elsewhere, by a token “vote of no confidence” circulated by the Chicago Teachers Union, an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers.
I’m thinking where can I register a “vote of no confidence” in the union?
In districts all over the country unions are asking teachers to take “no confidence” votes in administrations already strapped by taxpayers, who in turn are already strapped by Obamanomics. The “no confidence” votes are meant to test teachers’ resolve to strike.
The solution to the school funding issue is not asking property values to take a hit on higher taxes. Higher taxes mean not just an increased tax bill, but lower overall property values in the long run.
The solution for teachers, just like everyone else on Main Street, is a vibrant economy that produces lots of tax revenue at lower rates.
We know that teachers in Chicago aren’t getting the job dome on reading and writing for students.
Perhaps they should brush up on economics too.


FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV                                                                         by wp

American Socialism and The President 's Agenda Posted by Bud on September 22, 2012


By the time you are finished the article you will either see the comparison with the President's  actions, or think to yourself this guy is completely nuts, off his rocker, or loony tunes.
First let me make it clear that Nazi Socialism, Communism, and the Marxist philosophy are alive and fighting in America today. No they are not fighting with guns or attacking to kill people but attacking they are. They are attacking our freedoms, values, rights, and the Constitution of The United States. How can they manage to do this in today's world where you get the news 24/7 at the click of a button? Simple they are doing it from within our own Federal Government. They are doing it with a lot of help too. No not just the Obama Administration but many others also on both sides of the Isle.
But for the purpose here I will focus mainly on the comparison between their agenda for 2012-2013 and what the President  has done so far, and, what he has stated he will accomplish if re-elected.
The Socialist stated Platform for 2012-2013 as copied from their website.
The United States is the sole remaining global superpower. The U.S. government uses its overwhelming military power to consolidate its strategic hold over the entire world and to defend and advance the interests of U.S. owned corporations as they exploit the working people and natural resources of the entire planet. We stand in total opposition to U.S. imperialism and the current “war on terror” which is just another subterfuge for U.S. imperialism.
We call for the closing of all U.S. military facilities at home and abroad that train foreign military and paramilitary personnel.
1. We call for the United States to immediately and unconditionally withdraw its forces from Iraq and Afghanistan.
2. We call for an end to the U.S. occupation of the province of Guantanamo, Cuba.
3. We call for an end to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank-East Jerusalem and Gaza, and an end to all U.S. aid to Israel, as a precondition for peace.
4. We support an immediate cutoff of all U.S. military aid to Colombia, and all other recipients.
5. We call for the abolition of the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and all other institutions of covert warfare.
6. We stand for unconditional disarmament by the United States.
7. We call for an international treaty outlawing all weapons of mass destruction, including the use of depleted uranium in conventional weapons.
8. We call for an immediate 50% cut in the military budget, followed by additional cuts, with the aim of rapidly reducing the military budget to less than 10% of its current level, with the "peace dividend" directed to essential social services and to the cost of cleaning up contaminated military sites.
9. We call for the disbanding of NATO and all other aggressive military alliances, and the closing of all overseas bases.
10. We call for an end to U.S. arms sales throughout the world.
11. We call for the U.S. to pay off its debts to the United Nations, an end to veto power in the UN, and an end to permanent membership on the UN Security Council.
12. We call for a constitutional amendment requiring a binding vote of the people on all issues of war or military intervention.
13. We support the right of soldiers to form unions to represent their views and interests.
I will now take them and compare to the Obama agenda where they overlap.
1. Judgment You Can Trust In 2002, Obama had the judgment and courage to speak out against going to war, and to warn of "an occupation of undetermined length, with undetermined costs, and undetermined consequences." He and Joe Biden are fully committed to ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Same idea on number 1
2.Our Administration's position on  Guantanamo hasn't changed. We are still looking at our options with regards to the detainees. (If the position hasn't changed then he still, is looking to close Guantanamo.)
Same again number 2.
3. Renew American diplomacy to support strong alliances and to seek a lasting peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Obama and Biden will not increase nonmilitary aid, and hold them accountable for security in the border region.
Sounds like almost the same thing.
4. Not comparing this one. Because Colombia isn't a key issue on the election I was unable to find the President's position on it.
5. Allocate Funds Based on Risk: Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe that the president and Congress should direct our precious homeland security dollars according to risk, not as a form of general revenue sharing. Eliminating unnecessary agencies by combining them within a single agency.
Eliminate agencies sound like the platform again.
6. Review Weapons Programs: We must re-balance our capabilities to ensure that our forces can succeed in both conventional wars and in stabilization and counter-insurgency operations. (There is no explanation on what re-balance would mean so can't really compare if he is referring to cutting or not.)
Not comparing this one. Because of  unclear Obama position.
7. Ensure Freedom of Space: The Obama-Biden administration will restore American leadership on space issues, seeking a worldwide ban on weapons of mass destruction.
Now that is almost word for word the same.
8. The Obama Biden team has already started cutting the military funding which has resulted in base closings.
Again the same agenda it seems.
9-13 Are not in the public eye right now. I was unable to find any discussion on the topics so no comparison possible 
There are a lot of the Socialist Party's platform for 2012-2013 that the President seems to be in full agreement with. This however does not make him a full fledged socialist. What it does tell us he has some socialist tendencies which influence the way he leads.
I feel completely confident with a lot more research I could find many other connections between the Socialist Party of America and President Obama. The reasons behind this position is he was raised in a socialist environment and his self professed mentor was Frank Marshall Davis, a admitted socialist.
Now at the beginning I stated that the socialist were getting a lot of help from both sides. Example: No child left behind program. On the surface you would think what a great idea. But the actual result of the program is the dumbing down of our children. If a second grader has trouble reading he gets passed on to the third grade and the problem of the child not being able to read remains. The teacher doesn't take the required time to teach “one” child but promote that child on to the fourth grade. The cycle continues until the child graduates from high school or drops out.
One of the Socialist agendas years ago explained how to take over the schools and our children. Make them to dumb to compete in the capitalist system and the system will fail. Step by Step they achieved that goal with, “The no child left behind program.”
Taking prayer and the pledge of allegiance out of schools is another of their agendas. I know you are thinking by this point this is a conspiracy theory of his. The Communist Socialist take over?  Well I wish to God you were right but the cold hard facts say otherwise. And here is proof as presented to Congress in 1963.
Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963
Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.
At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:
I am not going to list all 45 goals here but just the few that back up what I said about educating our children. The entire speech to congress can be found many places online. Here is just 1
I used several sources to confirm the information. “The Naked Communist” book is available also at many places online including Ebay and Amazon. Or watch it on Youtube.
Okay the goals as they relate to education: Let's start with  #13. Do away with all loyalty oaths. That of course refers to removing the pledge of allegiance from schools among other oaths.  #17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks. #18. Gain control of all student newspapers.  #19 Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
The facts are screaming to be heard but because they have been changing things so slowly no one is paying attention. But when we do the politicians give us some cockeyed excuse or claim we are just being paranoid. The media blast us daily with why it's such a great idea, change, or advancement until the American public accept it and go on with their daily lives. Another loss of freedom for America and one step closer to the Communist achieving their goals of a total Socialist/Marxist country
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...