Saturday, November 2, 2013

L.A./Ontario International Airport Shooting Hoax


Obama Signs Tyrannical Exec Order Based on Debunked Science



The Little Red Hen - 2013 version

lady PigCow, where am I[2]Duck in grass"Who will help me plant my wheat?" asked the little red hen.
"Not I," said the cow.
"Not I," said the pig.
"Not I," said the goose.

"Then I will do it by myself." She planted her crop and the wheat grew and ripened.

"Who will help me reap my wheat?" asked the little red hen.
"Not I," said the duck.
"Out of my classification," said the pig.
"I'd lose my seniority," said the cow.
"I'd lose my unemployment compensation," said the goose.
"Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen, and so she did.

"Who will help me bake the bread?" asked the little red hen.
"That would be overtime for me," said the cow.
"I'd lose my welfare benefits," said the duck.
"I'm a dropout and never learned how," said the pig.
"If I'm to be the only helper, that's discrimination," said the goose.
"Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen.

She baked five loaves and held them up for all of her neighbors to see.

Jesse_JacksonBarbara Boxer CA Senatorcid:008c01ced0e9$3a3d0d00$8223B984@ownerVAIOfarmer[3]They wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share but the little red hen said, "No, I shall eat all five loaves."

"Excess profits!" cried the cow. (Nancy Pelosi)

Capitalist leech!" screamed the duck. (Barbara Boxer)

"I demand equal rights!" yelled the goose. (Jesse Jackson)

The pig just grunted in disdain. (Harry Reid)

And they all painted 'Unfair!' picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.

Then the farmer (Obama) came. He said to the little red hen, "You must not be so greedy."

"But I earned the bread," said the little red hen.

"Exactly," said Barack the farmer. "That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are lazy and idle."

And they all lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, "I am grateful, for now I truly understand."

But her neighbors became quite disappointed in her. She never again baked bread because she joined the 'party' and got her bread free. And all the Democrats smiled. 'Fairness' had been established.

Individual initiative had died but nobody noticed; perhaps no one cared so long as there was free bread that 'the rich' were paying for.

Barn, sun set


Bill Clinton is getting $12 million for his memoirs.
Hillary got $8 million for hers.

That's $20 million for the memories from two people, who for eight years repeatedly testified, under oath, that they couldn't remember anything!

Jon Stewart Blasts Obama: ‘You Didn’t Know?


Conservatives have received a lot of criticism from Barack Obama and his sycophants for daring to say not only that ObamaCare is an unconstitutional attack on our freedom, but also for exposing the stark reality that Obama in his narcissitic wisdom wouldn’t admit. To put it simply, government has not business getting in between a patient and their doctors/health care choices. Conservatives have often said that ObamaCare would give us a big government entity with the efficiency of the post office and the compassion of the IRS. For that, conservatives were called racist, haters, extortionists and were accused of simply wanting the president to fail.
Since the launch of, the site used to sign up for ObamaCare, there has been one disaster after. From the initial moment of the launch, to say that the site faltered would be putting it mildly. The error messages and security issues begged the question of whether this site was even tested. When word got out that a failed Canadian company, CGI, received a no-bid contract to build the website for anywhere from $94 million to $600 million, Americans were furthered outraged. Learning that a top CGI executive has been friends with Michelle Obama since her days at Princeton had many crying cronyism.
While many on the left are still, in typical fashion, continuing to provide cover for the trainwreck of, Jon Stewart provided more hard hitting commentary than most ‘real journalists’ have done.
Infringe sticker
Stewart provided a little backdrop to his segment regarding the fiasco of ObamaCare with a clip of a CNN interview with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Do you know when he (Obama) first knew that there was a problem?
Kathleen Sebelius: Well, I think it became clear fairly early on. Uh, the first couple of days.
Gupta: Not before that, though. Not before October 1st?
Sebelius: No sir.
Jon Stewart: You didn’t know that there would be problems until the day it launched? This is your signature program! Your name is on it! It would be like if the Charmin bear just found out what people actually do with his toilet paper. ‘You put this where? Oh my God! I’ve been rubbing this on my face for years!’ Now, it may be a bit concerning that the president was not kept in the loop about a program that was named after him. But, in his defense, there appear to be very few loops he is in.
Stewart again leaned on the news in his attack against Obama as a ‘Know-Nothing’ president. The report indicated that the NSA has been spying on world leaders for five years, but Obama was supposedly kept in the dark for the entire five years. Stewart’s response was classic.
Jon Stewart: So, for five years, I assume the president had been presented with the findings from this world leader monitoring. And in those five years, it never occurred to him to say, ‘How are we getting this?’ Does the president believe in surveillance fairies? You know, this is crazy and, more importantly, if the president was unaware that we were spying on our allies, who gave the go-ahead to spy on our allies?
ABC News report: An NSA spokeswoman said that it takes orders from something called the National Intelligence Priorities Framework and not the president.
Stewart: What the f*@$ is this?
Indeed, Jon Stewart. What the f*@$ is this ???

Bill Clinton said Obama was 'luckier than a dog with two d***s' to face hapless Mitt Romney in 2012 election


A new book released next week is packed full of political revelations from last year's election, including the real story of the sometime tense relationship between Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.
Double Down: Game Change 2012, written by John Heilemann and Mark Halperin who penned a bestseller about the 2008 election, comes out on November 5.
Sneak previews of the book have already given up some tantalizing tidbits, such as the revelation that Clinton described Obama as 'luckier than a dog with d***s' in facing hapless challenger Mitt Romney in the last presidential race.
Fortunate: Bill Clinton apparently said that President Obama was 'luckier than a dog with two d***s' in facing the hapless Mitt Romney in the 2008 election
Fortunate: Bill Clinton apparently said that President Obama was 'luckier than a dog with two d***s' in facing the hapless Mitt Romney in the 2008 election

Meanwhile, after a golf session that Clinton didn't take seriously enough for Obama's liking, the book reveals that current president said he only liked his predecessor 'in doses.'
According to Politico, Clinton couldn't believe Obama's luck in facing Romney.
Game Change 2012 states: 'Clinton had watched in wonder as Obama caught break after break... Meanwhile, Romney's ineptness staggered Clinton.'
While Clinton thought that Romney was 'a decent man', following the release of the the controversial 47 percent video, the ex-president then told a friend that the Republican candidate 'was in the wrong line of work.'
Patience: After a game of golf Obama apparently said he liked Clinton 'in doses'
Patience: After a game of golf Obama apparently said he liked Clinton 'in doses'

'He really shouldn't be speaking to people in public,' Clinton added.
Politico's excerpt continues: 'As for Obama, Clinton trotted out for his pals the same line again and again: "He's luckier than a dog with two dicks."'
The difficult relationship between the Obamas and the Clintons eventually thawed. But at this stage Barack also had his own less than positive opinions on Bill.
The two worked on their friendship on the famous golf course at St Andrews, Scotland.
Secrets: The sneak previews from Double Down: Game Change 2012 the book released on Friday also reveal that Clinton said that Romney 'shouldn't be speaking to people in public'
Secrets: The sneak previews from Double Down: Game Change 2012 the book released on Friday also reveal that Clinton said that Romney 'shouldn't be speaking to people in public'

But while Obama was apparently keen to play the game, Clinton kept chatting and joking and taking numerous second shots, or mulligans in golf terminology.
After the game an aide reportedly asking Obama how the time on the course had gone. According to the book, the president 'grimaced' and replied 'I like him … in doses.'



EXCELLENT ESSAY: Can We Finally Stop Pretending? BY JEFFREY T. BROWN


Can We Finally Stop Pretending?

By Jeffrey T. Brown
Every day, it seems, more people who have been screaming their hatred for those who predicted all we see coming true are admitting what we have known all along. The president is incapable of telling a truth, and what conservatives have been predicting for three years about ObamaCare has been entirely correct. Indeed, we haven't seen anything close to the worst of what is to come, since the system hasn't even begun to function in its utmost state of disarray and confusion. We've seen a website and estimates of premium and deductible figures which have been panic-inducing all on their own. There is not one single fact about this monstrosity that has been truly presented by the president, and his law, its destruction of lives and fortunes, and the pattern of fraud that have accompanied it rest solely and squarely on the Democratic Party. They did this to the United States of America and they did it on purpose.

The left has fought the factual arguments of their opponents with screaming accusations, smears, slanders, and character assassination, with the hysterical label of "racist" trumping all others. It has become reflexive, and thus almost meaningless in its lack of substance, but not entirely so. It bespeaks a psychosis that infects every response of the left to facts, experience, knowledge, and hard-earned wisdom. The finger pointing has been calculated and malicious. And it has been sadly effective with the indoctrinated. Many on the left actually believe that reasoned, factual opposition to policies founded on lies is motivated by racism, rather than what such policies have done and are doing to those who have the courage to speak out against them.

In truth, conservatives care little about race, other than in its use as a weapon by the left. Conservatives embraced Dr. King's message from the outset, at the same time that liberals were setting up a grievance system designed to pollute and exploit it. Conservatives care about policies, not skin color. Opposition to ObamaCare was never about bigotry or hatred. It was about logic, and foresight, and reaching self-evident conclusions. It was about the truth. So mentally conditioned to acceptance of the smear has the left become, however, that they are entirely unprepared to coherently explain what is now unfolding before their eyes.
For those on the left who seem befuddled by the train wreck that is ObamaCare, perhaps some introspection is in order. The political lynching of conservatives for the last five years has been an unmitigated lie. Everything conservatives predicted is coming to pass. Every truth they told is playing out publicly. The serial prevaricator who is our president has finally been exposed in ways that even his staunchest spinners cannot spin. The crashed $643 million dollar website, the skyrocketing premiums, the job losses, the dropping of plans by insurers, all of it is out there now regardless of the president's skin color, which was never the issue except to the extent that it has protected him from responsibility for what he has purposefully done, even to his supporters.

So, can we finally stop pretending that the left has a positive plan for the United States? Can we stop pretending that the president meant to do anything other than destroy a system he has hated since his socialist-influenced youth? Can we dispense with the unhinged rants about dog whistles and face up to the fact that conservatives have been right about this all along? Can we finally openly discuss that the left's own hatred and bigotry are largely to blame for where we are now, not just regarding ObamaCare? They have protected, helped and worshiped an illusion, with pure malice toward those who have loved and fought for this country, and are entirely complicit in the damage now being done to every fiber of our nation. They have intentionally derailed reasoned opposition to purposefully detrimental policies, and have exploited hatred and bigotry to do it. Their own hatred, now so clearly shown to be unfounded, doesn't just inform the left with regard to health care, or opposition thereto. It informs everything the left does, every position they take, every feeling they have. It is their malignant security blanket.

For decades, every time we have faced serious issues as a country, the outcome has had more to do with liberals' hatred of their opponents and traditional American values than with solving problems constructively. Before so immediate and punitive a mess as has been the implementation of ObamaCare, we have been without a single, irrefutable teaching device with which to demonstrate the utter malice that is all of progressivism and liberalism, or what it portends for the future of every citizen of our country. We can argue reasoned predictions and logic until the cows come home, but nothing is as personal as a direct assault on those who have loyally bought and perpetuated the lies through their well-conditioned hatred and bigotry of those who, shockingly, were actually correct.

We now have a teachable moment. A window has opened for many who have been lifelong Democrats to see what they have been suckered into doing to themselves and their fellow citizens, and for whom. Perhaps they possess enough remnants of objectivity, and a long enough memory, to recognize in hindsight the purposeful falsity of the vicious and very personal attacks they saw, and possibly cheered, from their own party representatives during the recent government shutdown, and for years before that. Maybe there is enough intellectual honesty left in some of them to finally understand the extent to which they are misled, misinformed, manipulated, and misrepresented by those who pretend to stand for anything constructive or beneficial to their country or its future. The very same people angrily uttering those lies proudly voted to impose ObamaCare upon them, along with financial hardship and the loss of health insurance. Pathological liars are not especially selective. They lie about everything to everyone.

Can we finally stop pretending that they are not also lying to us about everything else? Can we stop pretending they are not lying to us about guns, and abortion, and voter fraud, and voter ID laws, and taxes, and the economy, and the environment, and education, and energy, and job creation, and national security, and international relations, and Islam, and their assault on Christianity, and amnesty, and entitlements, and stimulus, and recovery, and Fast and Furious, and Benghazi, and the IRS scandal, and a war on women, and our borders, and domestic surveillance, and weakening us militarily, and their supposed loyalty as Americans, and their phony patriotism, and American Exceptionalism, and our history, and our national character, and the historical good our country has done, and what they really have planned for us, and what we will achieve when we are out from under the heel of burgeoning socialism and despotism?

And yes, can we finally stop pretending that we are a racist country? Can we stop pretending that perceived racial problems don't derive from Americans who profit from oppressing and discouraging other Americans, and that the profiteers don't share the same party affiliation, and often the same skin color, as the "oppressed"? Can we stop pretending that the American left is not irrationally bound and determined to remake our country into a cesspool of misery and failure allegedly out of some demented sense of fairness, to be ruled over by those who seek only to control, rather than improve the lot of the people they are supposed to raise up?

When that light finally comes on, let us not miss the opportunity to drive home what conservatives have always known. We cannot emerge from this darkness and achieve our full potential as a nation until we stop pretending that everything we are told by the left is not a lie. 


 I may have just found a new favorite congressman (or woman – I guess).
Her name is Renee Ellmers and she is a representative from the Tar Heel State. You may be wondering what she’s done to earn my fandom… let’s just say she created quite a scene and left the Obama administration looking foolish.
See, Obamacare is designed as a one-size-fits-all healthcare system so ridiculous things happen. For example, men being forced to pay for maternity coverage they will never, ever use.
Rep. Ellmers uses this ridiculousness to prove the foolishness behind the Obamacare design.

First, she starts by completely blowing up a recent Democrat trend of pretending they loved the Medicare Part D program, pointing out that they were all against it, and that while it seems similar to the Obamacare program, the one main difference is that Medicare Part D is completely voluntary.
Then she quickly moves on to the major thrust of her line of questioning which leaves HHS chief and Obama minion Kathleen Sebelius looking like a bumbling fool.
Ellmers: … Now I--you know, as far as the essential health benefits [of Obamacare], correct me if I'm wrong, do men not have to buy maternity coverage? 
Sebelius: Policies will cover maternity coverage for young and healthy-- 
Ellmers: Including men?
Sebelius: Under 30-year-olds will have a choice also of a catastrophic plan which has no maternity coverage.
ellmersEllmers: The men are required to purchase-- 
Sebelius: Well, an insurance policy has a series of benefits, whether you use them or not. And one of the benefits will be-- 
Ellmers: And that is why the health care premiums are increasing this high, because we're forcing them to buy things they will never need
Ellmers: To the best of your knowledge has a man ever delivered a baby?
Sebelius: I don't think so.
What a complete and utter implosion by Secretary Sebelius. I’m not sure it could have gone worse had she been trying to fail! In two short minutes Ellmers dispels a Democrat myth, shows how foolish the Democrat healthcare plan is, and then explains why the Democrat plan is simply unworkable. It was a perfect dressing down of an all too often patronizing Obama administration. Way to go Representative Ellmers!




What is it with the Obama administration’s chronic inability to tell the truth? It’s starting to feel like they may really have a problem. Some might even go as far as calling anyone who works in the Obama administration a pathological liar.
Well, they’ve been caught lying yet again.
In the first couple of weeks after the Obamacare rollout began, it became painfully obvious to everyone observing that the rollout was a complete and utter failure. With all of the problems with Obamacare it was easy to miss out on the most important things, so the media tried to focus on what they thought was the most important aspect of the roll out. How many people had signed up for Obamacare?
Easy question, right? Apparently not for the Obama team.
On October 3, White House spokesperson Jay Carney, pressed for enrollment numbers, said, “No, we don’t have that data.”
On October 7, in an appearance on the Daily Show, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius repeated the claim when questioned about enrollment: “I can’t tell you,” she said, “because I don’t know.” 

After a couple of weeks of not getting any information on this front, the media began to rebel – even liberals at the left’s favorite media outlet, MSNBC, were getting tired of the obfuscation and lies.

“The secrecy is unacceptable… how many people have enrolled? I don’t understand why they can’t release that information?”
Now we know why they wouldn’t release the information – because it was embarrassing.
Apparently there were only SIX successful enrollees on the first day that the Obamacare exchange opened for business. Day two went a little better for the Obama administration as 242 people signed up for coverage. Bringing the exciting two day toll to 248 people. The lack of interest would have been a big story in and of itself, but we now know that the Obama administration knew from the start what the enrollment numbers were… even though they said otherwise.
lyingsebeliusThe short-hand is that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius lied.
Leaked meeting notes from high-level war room briefings inside the federal health bureaucracy on October 2 and October 3 report that federal officials were aware of the exact number of federal enrollees on the first and second days in which the exchanges were running.
It’s possible that the White House spokesman Jay Carney was unaware (possible but unlikely), but it’s ridiculous to think that the person in charge of the Obamacare roll out wasn’t made aware of the high level meeting where they discussed how many people had enrolled. This would have been her chief concern and something she would have been working to figure out from the start.
Folks, Secretary Sebelius has been lying all along.





Threat Journal Logo Banner - ALLOW  IMAGES
Nov 02, 2013
Threat Journal is a weekly supplement to the AlertsUSA National Threat
and Incident Notification Service for Mobile Devices
Facebook Twitter


Now Published Each Saturday Afternoon

Fukushima Unit #4 Spent Fuel Pool - ALLOW IMAGES
Fukushima #4 Fuel Removal a
Catastrophic Threat to N. America
Nov 02, 2013
On October 30th, 2013, AlertsUSA issued the following
Flash message to subscriber mobile devices:
TEPCO to begin removal of spent fuel from Fukushima #4 within days. Signif potential for catastrophic release of radioactive material to atmosphere. Monitoring...

What You Need To Know
Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has announced they will soon begin attempting removal of more than 1200 spent nuclear fuel assemblies from a cooling pool more than 100 feet above ground at the severely damaged Fukushima #4 reactor. As previously reported by AlertsUSA Threat Journal on multiple occasions, scientists worldwide have warned for well over two years of the global dangers and implications of this process.
In the case of Fukushima Unit #4, the racks holding the fuel assemblies were damaged and deformed during the earthquake and explosion in March of 2011. The building is shattered, structurally unsound and highly vulnerable. In addition, spent nuclear fuel cannot be simply lifted into the air by a crane. It must be lifted and transferred at all times in water and heavily shielded structures.
During the removal process, if the fuel assemblies touch, are dropped or break open there is potential for uncontrolled nuclear reactions and explosions to occur.
Boiling Water Reactor Nuclear Fuel Assembly - ALLOW IMAGES
According to Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary of Energy, Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and one of the nation's leading experts on spent fuel pools, "There is more than 37 million curies of long lived radioactivity stored up in the spent fuel just within this single pool. If another severe earthquake were to strike causing the pool to drain, or some other event such as an explosion, it could result in a catastrophic radiological fire releasing nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 [into the Earths atmosphere] as was released by the Chernobyl accident.
And that is just one of approximately 200 different types of radioactive isotopes that could potentially be released.
According to Gregory Jaczko, former Chairman of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the upcoming attempt to remove Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel is "unprecedented, the pool has significant structural damage and that the overall effort is very risky."
According to Arnie Gunderson, Sr. Engineer at Fairewinds Energy and a former nuclear industry executive with more than 40 years experience, "TEPCO has already admitted that the boron shields in the fuel racks separating the fuel bundles have deteriorated. These shields absorb neutrons and keep the the fuel cells subcritical."
According to Yale University Professor Emeritus Charles Perrow, a frequent author for the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, "This has me scared." In the event of an explosion, "Tokyo would have to be evacuated because of cesium and other poisons that are there will spread very rapidly. Even if the wind is blowing the other way it's going to be monumental."
According to Shunichi Tanaka, Japan's Nuclear Regulatory Chairman, "I am much more worried about this than contaminated water.”
According to Mycle Schneider, an energy consultant and adviser to members of the European Parliament and the Int'l Atomic Energy Agency, "A massive spent fuel fire would likely dwarf the current dimensions of the catastrophe and could exceed the radioactivity releases of Chernobyl dozens of times."
His and other's concerns are not limited to Japan. An accident in this fuel removal process will have dramatic public health ramifications for the United States and Canada many times worse than the original Fukushima explosions and meltdowns.
Cesium-137 Deposition Map - ALLOW IMAGES
It must be understood that the U.S. is directly downwind. In a worse case scenario you will have only a few days to make any type of preparedness moves to protect yourself and family as prevailing winds and weather patterns carry airborne contaminants to the East for rainout / fallout across N. America.
And here is the kicker: The fuel removal process is expected to take many months, if not longer. But it has to be done. Leaving the spent fuel in the damaged pool is not an option.
Readers need to give serious to consideration to the warnings in this story. As repeatedly referenced in the lead up to this fuel removal effort, we strongly urge you to download the 3 free nuclear emergency preparedness guides below and actually read them. They are written for you by some of this nation's most skilled and knowledgeable in the area of radiation safety and preparedness.
As we reported just a few weeks back, even the federal government is making plans for such a disaster with the recent emergency purchase of tens of millions of dollars in medications to help combat radiation sickness. While they are not publicizing the move, this is your cue. You don't want to be caught looking at your feet. Judging from the near non-existent mainstream news coverage here in the U.S., the time for you to prepare is now.
AlertsUSA monitors activities at the Fukushima facility 24/7/365 and will immediately notify service subscribers of significant developments via text messages to their mobile devices.
Get the service. Stay Informed.
AlertsUSA Service for Mobile Devices - ALLOW IMAGES

* Be One Of The First To Know When The SHTF.
* Get Away Early, Give Your Family Extra Safety.
* In Wide Use By Gov, 1st Responders, Travelers.
* 24/7/365 Monitoring. Only the Bad Stuff. No Hype.
* Issued Hours and Days before the MSM.
* On your Cell Phone, Tablet or Email.
* We Give The Clear Truth, Unlike the MSM.
* Over a Decade in Operation!

We are NOT part of the government.
In fact, they are our customers!


Free PDF Guides on Preparing For
and Responding to Nuclear Emergencies.
1. What To Do If A Nuclear Disaster is Imminent
2. When an Ill Wind Blows From Afar
3. The Good News About Nuclear Destruction (It's Survivable)

Radition Safety Products - ALLOW IMAGES

Travel Security Update
TSA Expands Scope of Passenger Screening
The Transportation Security Administration has begun dramatically expanding the scope of airline passenger screening to include searches of a wide variety of government databases for traveler background information well before they ever arrive at the airport for a scheduled trip.
The Transportation Security Administration states that the ultimate goal is to streamline actual airport security checks for millions of travelers who pose no risk by qualifying fully one quarter of passengers for lighter screening.

The U.S. Dept. of State is the authoritative federal source for information on the security situation at travel destinations worldwide. With tensions rapidly increasing in most regions, readers planning on international travel, even to such common destinations as Canada, Mexico or the Caribbean Islands, are strongly encouraged to do a little research on the security situation prior to departure.
Latest USGOV Travel Warnings
Important Travel Alerts

See all USGOV Travel Alerts and Warnings HERE.

Take Advantage of These Resources
Our social media channels provide a steady steam of important news and resources between issues of Threat Journal with little or no overlap of content. Combined with the AlertsUSA service for instant mobile notification of the really bad developments, you have an unmatched set of tools to keep yourself fully up to speed on the nation's threat environment.
With times getting worse by the day, we urge you to utilize these resources.

We want your feedback! Let us know your thoughts on today's issue.
Visit us at service [at]
Copyright © 2011-2013 Threat Journal
NOTE: If URLs do not appear as live links in your e-mail program, please cut and paste the full URL into the location or address field of your browser. Disclaimer: Threat Journal and AlertsUSA, Inc., may from time to time recommend products that we've either personally checked out ourselves, or that come from people we know and trust. For doing so, we receive a commission. We will never recommend any product that does not have a 100% money-back satisfaction guarantee. Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized Financial Advice. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized Financial Advice. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized Health Care Advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed health care professionals. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized Health Care Advice. Any Health Care recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your Doctor and licensed Health Care Advisor.
Deuteronomy 8:18 (NAS): But thou shalt remember the LORD thy God: for it is He that giveth thee power to get wealth, that he may establish his covenant which he swore unto thy fathers, as it is this day.

AlertsUSA Inc.

19785 W. 12 Mile Rd #183
Southfield, MI
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...