Saturday, May 24, 2014


For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Not fair to make judgement of this,
Until you see what the Fire Chief says!!!!

In South Los Angeles, a 4-plex home was destroyed by a fire.

A Mexican family of six, all welfare recipients and gang members, lived on the first floor.  They died.
An Islamic group of seven welfare cheats, all illegally in the country from Kenya, lived on the second floor.  They, too, all perished.
Six LA, Hispanic, gang bangers & ex-cons lived on the 3rd floor.  They, too, died.
A white couple lived on the top floor.
The couple survived the fire.

Jesse Jackson, John Burris and Al Sharpton were furious!! They flew into LA and met with the fire chief. On camera, they loudly demanded to know why blacks, Muslims and Hispanics all died in the fire and why only the white couple lived? 

The Fire Chief said, "They were at work."

About to hit the fan…(INTELLECTUAL FROGLEGS), IFL 2014 #9 By : JoeDanMedia


PattonWell, looks like this is the last episode from Kansas City—next weekend is the move to Nashville.  And while I have been critical of Kansas City—I am very thankful that I had this fantastic opportunity here.   And I will be forever indebted to my Aunt Jean — who I am convinced is an angel from God. 
I’m very excited to hopefully get a chance to work with some video production professionals.  I’m sure there are a lot of things I can learn.
Thank you guys for the awesome support.
As it stands, Intellectual Froglegs will return in less than a month.
So, I’m going to get out of here.  Hope y’all have a great Memorial Day…and remember what it’s all about.  And as you know I love good quotes, so here’s a dandy one from General Patton:
“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.” 
- See more at:

Friday, May 23, 2014

Boehner must Impeach if Obama doesn't Cooperate


If Obama pulls a Fast & Furious with Benghazi, Boehner MUST Impeach.

Web Version  |  Unsubscribe




P.S. The questions must be answered. Witnesses subpoenaed. Documents, transcripts and intel compiled, investigated and evaluated.

Virtually all the questions Special Operations Speaks has asked -- that the nation has asked -- have yet to be answered. Why is that?

Because President Obama and his administration have spent over a year and a half downplaying, burying and distorting the facts around September 11th, 2012. But ultimately, thanks to grassroots pressure, Obama failed. The Benghazi Select Committee is proceeding.

REMEMBER FAST AND FURIOUS…Redacted documents and Executive Privilege? NEVER AGAIN, Not with Benghazi.

Don’t Let Obama Legally Maneuver Around the Select Committee…If He Tries Boehner MUST Impeach HIM.

Join us in demanding Obama -- or anyone else, for that matter -- cease interfering and suppressing evidence under penalty of impeachment.

Too much time has been wasted already and it's not fair to those men who lost their lives or to their families

Scottie Hughes: If Chris McDaniel Beats Sen. Thad Cochran ‘The Whole Table Has Turned’


  ‘WILL The Whole Table Have Turned’


Scottie.Hughes.on.VarneyTPNN News Director Scottie Nell Hughes appeared on Varney & Co. on Fox Business on Friday to discuss Tuesday’s elections in which moderate candidates defeated more Tea Party-oriented candidates in a handful of primary races. 
Host Stuart Varney said the the victories of the moderates were a “significant retreat” for the Tea Party, in his opinion and asked Scottie to weigh in. 
“Let’s get it right out there,” Varney began. “I say that voters in those primaries gravitated more to the moderates, the center of the Republican Party, and a little bit away from the Tea Party. Would you go with that?” Varney asked Scottie. 
Scottie agreed that “this week” that seemed to be the result, but reminded Varney of the week before where Senate candidate Ben Sasse from Nebraska easily defeated the GOP establishment-backed moderate candidate. 
Scottie told Varney that, “This is what primary season is” about and that, “We have to find ways to unite,” after primary season or the GOP is going to lose in November. “We are a movement,” Scottie said with passion, referring to the pro-liberty, pro-Constitution Tea Party movement, and shouldn’t be judged only on electoral wins and losses. 
Stuart Varney then asked the question the GOP establishment is dying to know, “Will you, Tea Party people, support the moderates in November?”
Scottie answers that the key race will be the one between Chris McDaniel and 42-year Washington incumbent, 76 year-old, Thad Cochran (who has said repeatedly that he really doesn’t know much about the Tea Party):

“We hope that we don’t have moderates, because we really do have a lot of good conservatives. Look at Chris McDaniel [Tea Party-backed U.S. Senate candidate]. I think this is the race to watch down in Mississippi. Chris McDaniel, in June, he’s going up against Thad Cochran. He’s up in polls right now by 3%. That one right there, I guarantee if Chris wins, the whole table has turned.”
The GOP Senate race primary in Mississippi is on June 3.

Scottie and Varney, along with Charles Payne then go on to discuss IRS employees receiving bonuses, even though they owe back taxes!



Feds Force Oklahoma to Overturn Anti-Sharia Law & Pay Islamists $303,333

The US government has forced the state of Oklahoma to overturn its anti-Sharia bill, after a Muslim man named Muneer Awad sued the state for supposed violations against “freedom of religion.”
CAIR also played a role in subverting the bill. Adam Soltani of CAIR said:
Sharia is the moral code of conduct for Muslims, and that includes certain aspects of laws, like marital laws, divorce, inheritance, wills…it encompasses part of that, but it’s also the moral code of conduct
The state of Oklahoma must now pay $303,333 to Awad for legal fees, costs and nontaxable expenses. The money is going into the hands of Muslims because the lawsuit was done by CAIR, a Muslim jihadist organization of Islamic lawyers. Awad himself is a lawyer and the executive director for CAIR. The state of Oklahoma is paying money right into the pockets of Muslims. The Muslim heretic Awad boasted the victory:
This was just politicians optimistically looking for an issue… Look what happened. Not only did the state question get struck down, but they’ll have to pay attorney fees and interest over three years.
Rep. Clark Jolley, R-Edmond, said that paying the fine “is an obligation of the state…I think that’s a disagreement with us and the courts… We passed that as a Legislature. We lost the lawsuit.
According to Jordan Sekulow, the bill never infringed on the Islamic religion, but was placed to prevent international codes of law from entering the government:
At its core, the amendment has nothing to do with infringing on a Muslim’s right to practice Islam or religious freedom generally. This amendment is about “judicial authority,” and is not a “demonization” of Islam.
70% of Oklahomans wanted the anti-Sharia bill, and trusted that the state would maintain it, but this decision shows that the government cannot be trusted, and that only a revolutionary measure though the populace, and not the total reliance on the state, will actually end the Muslim takeover the country.
This Islamic victory only shows one thing: American society is enabling the Muslims to advance their agenda. Unlimited freedom of religion will only lead to limits on Christianity. As I have written in my article, Religious Liberty Leads To Tyranny:
All of civilization, came as a result of religious intolerance
Editor's Note: Frankly, it's about high time that a governor with some guts stands up and says that they aren't going to obey the feds in matters like this. The states retained this power. They didn't give it to the federal government and Governor Mary Fallin should be ignoring the ruling and implementing the law. However, sadly she has demonstrated a lack of will.


Florida Drills For Martial Law!! People are Clueless and Excited!


Dear Lord! People need to email and call Mayor Bob Buckhorn of Florida! He thinks it GREAT foreign troops are training with ours on U.S. soil to control terrorism! Doesn't he KNOW that WE the People are the Terrorists Now??? Send Him the videos and news articles of the government purchasing millions of civilian no hesitate targets! Of women, children and elderly!! If This Mayor is this clueless WE ARE NOT SPREADING THIS INFO ENOUGH! We have to SHARE this info with our mayors, senators and congressmen!!! This mayor either "JUST DOESN'T KNOW? or He is Bought Off??

New Emails Reveal Obama White House Worked on Concocting Benghazi Lie


Obama Hillary
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said on Thursday that the Obama White House was contacting YouTube owner Google during the Benghazi terrorist attacks, working on the false narrative even before Americans were out of harm’s way and before the intelligence community examined available evidence.
The still classified Obama State Department email, according to Issa, shows that the Obama White House rushed to settle on the false narrative of the anti-Islamic YouTube video instigating the attacks, which was completely at odds with the conclusions reached by reports from the ground. 

This new evidence destroys the Obama White House claims, communicated by Obama spokesman Jay Carney, that the White House obtained the false narrative from CIA talking points, since, according to Congressman Issa, the communication with YouTube was conducted by the Obama White House before  any CIA talking points were concocted.
The subject line of the email, ironically sent at 9:11 p.m. (the attacks took place on 9/11/12) on the night of the attack, was “Update on Response to actions – Libya,” hours before  the attack had ended.
“The e-mail shows the White House had hurried to settle on a false narrative — one at odds with the conclusions reached by those on the ground — before Americans were even out of harm’s way or the intelligence community had made an impartial examination of available evidence,” Issa said.
Issa has called for the Obama White House to declassify the email.
According to Issa, one of the items noted in the email stated, “White House is reaching out to U-Tube [sic] to advise ramifications of the posting of the Pastor Jon video.”
Issa scolded current Secretary of State, Democrat John Kerry, for just now turning over a classified version of the email, some 20 months after the attack, while calling on the regime to release a unclassified copy. 
“Unfortunately, Secretary Kerry and the State Department continue to try to keep this information from the public, only turning this document over to Congress last month. While the information I have cited from this email is clearly unclassified, the State Department has attempted to obstruct its disclosure by not providing Congress with an unclassified copy of this document that redacted only classified portions outlining what the Department of Defense and the Secretary of State were doing in response to the attack in Benghazi that night.”
“This tactic prevents the release of the email itself,” said Issa.

Libertarian Gary Johnson Trying for Another Third Party Run


Image: Libertarian Gary Johnson Trying for Another Third Party Run
Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, who ran for president in 2012 with the Libertarian Party, said he would like to be a third party candidate in 2016, the National Journal reported.
Johnson was elected in 1994 as a Republican in New Mexico and served two terms as governor. He participated in a Reddit "Ask Me Anything" session last week. "I hope to be able to run in 2016," Johnson replied to a query, according to the National Journal. Among his policy pronouncements, Johnson said he favored eliminating guaranteed government student loans. Doing so would reduce college costs, he said. He is also for disbanding the Drug Enforcement Administration. "A lot of prison guards, judges and lawyers" would also need "to find something else to do" in a more libertarian America. He prefers being a Libertarian rather than Republican candidate. "I would love running as a Libertarian because I would have the least amount of explaining to do." Johnson garnered about 1.2 million votes in the 2012 presidential election or roughly 1 percent of the popular vote, the Journal reported. He supported legalized marijuana and single-sex marriage early on. "Yesterdays Republicans wouldn't have dreamed of supporting state gay-marriage laws or medical marijuana. Now, the GOP's big names are skirting those issues, but not openly opposing them, either," according to the Journal. Johnson promotes himself on a website as having been the "most fiscally conservative governor" in the country. He vetoed more bills than all other governors combined and by the time he left office, New Mexico taxes had been cut and the state budget balanced, he said. Related Stories:

Pakistan’s Holy Islamic Council Endorses Child Marriage

In a retrogressive step, a religious body in Pakistan has declared girls as young as nine years old eligible to be married “if the signs of puberty were visible”, a media report said today.

Thursday, May 22, 2014




May 20 (Reuters) - Voters in two small Oregon counties on Tuesday approved controversial ballot measures to ban cultivation of genetically engineered crops within their boundaries, though one measure is vulnerable to legal challenge under a new state law.
The measure in Jackson County in southern Oregon, garnering "yes" votes from nearly 66 percent of voters there, has drawn national attention and more than $1 million in campaign funding to the community, which has just 117,650 registered voters.
The results are still unofficial and will likely not be certified for nearly three weeks, according to Jackson County Clerk Chris Walker.
The ban is supported by a coalition of more than 180 farmers and community members, who have been pushing for the vote on the issue for more than two years.
"It's a great day for the people of Oregon who care about sustainability and healthy ecosystems," the group GMO Free Oregon declared on its Facebook page after the results.
Opponents conceded defeat but said the debate would continue.
"We respect the voice of the voters, but remain convinced...the crop ban is bad public policy," said Barry Bushue, president of the Oregon Farm Bureau.
"We will continue to fight to protect the rights of all farmers to choose for themselves how they farm."
Supporters say the area's organic and conventional crops are in danger of contamination by genetically engineered crops, which are typically altered to withstand pesticides or resist insect damage. They also fear widespread use of pesticides associated with the crops.
"We are either going to choose the chemical corporations for agriculture or we are going to choose our family farms," local farmer Chris Hardy, a grower of beets and Swiss chard who helped start the initiative, said earlier in the day.
The Jackson County measure requires people to "harvest, destroy or remove all genetically engineered plants" within 12 months of the enactment of the ordinance.
A similar measure was approved on Tuesday in neighboring Josephine County. But that measure is expected to be challenged in court because it is not exempt from a 2013 law barring such GMO bans. Jackson County's effort was under way before that law and is thus exempt.
Last year, an experimental, unapproved biotech wheat strain developed by Monsanto Co. was discovered contaminating a farm field in the state. Wheat exports were temporarily disrupted because foreign buyers feared contamination.
Opponents say the GMO bans will be costly to enforce. Campaign materials urging a "no" vote said it was "important for Jackson County to embrace all forms of farming and ranching."
Jackson County, Oregon, is not alone. In 2004, Mendocino County, California, became the first jurisdiction in the United States to outlaw the production of genetically modified crops.
Tuesday's vote comes as a larger movement is under way in many U.S. states to seek mandatory labeling of foods made from genetically engineered crops.
Monsanto and other developers of genetically engineered crops say their products are safe and that mandatory labels will confuse consumers and increase costs of food production. (Writing and additional reporting by Carey Gillam in Kansas City; Editing by Cynthia Osterman, Steve Gorman and Clarence Fernandez)

318,000 fed workers owe $3.3B in back taxes, IRS says


More than 318,000 federal workers and retirees owe just over $3.3 billion in back taxes, the Internal Revenue Service said Thursday.
That works out to nearly 3.3 percent of all 9.8 million federal workers and retirees who are behind on their taxes — significantly lower than the proportion of delinquent taxpayers in the overall population. The IRS estimates that to be at least 8.7 percent.
Those behind in their tax payments include 714 people working for the House and Senate. IRS officials said the data used to compile the report does not indicate whether any of those delinquent taxpayers were members of Congress.
In addition, 821 employees of the nation's federal courts have overdue tax bills. IRS officials said the data did not indicate whether any of them were judges.

Agency officials said the IRS pursues delinquent taxes from federal workers the same way it goes after money that others owe. The agency will initially send at least two bills for the taxes it believes are due, a process that eventually can evolve into garnishing wages from paychecks or seizing property.
Almost 4.1 percent of active civilian government workers owe back taxes, the report said.
Among Cabinet-level departments, the highest rate of delinquency is at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, where 5.3 percent of workers have overdue taxes. The lowest was at the Treasury Department — which includes the IRS — where 1.2 percent of workers were delinquent.
The IRS said 1.7 percent of active duty military personnel are overdue. So are almost 2.7 percent of those in the Reserves and National Guard.
Among retirees, 2.6 percent of retired civilian workers and 4.2 percent of retired military are delinquent.
The figures are as of Sept. 30, 2013.

Obama Admin’s Declaration that Al Qaeda is no Longer a Threat to the US Causes US Intelligence Officials to Revolt


This should come as no surprise from an administration that sets up Muslim Brotherhood members in top positions in the federal government, aids the avowed enemies of the US, and has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Members of the Obama administration, including National Security Adviser Susan Rice and White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough apparently met with senators from both sides of the aisle late Tuesday. According to several of those senators, the meeting was focused on foreign policy and was supposed to be secret, but Yahoo News received comment from some of those senators. Sen. Bob Corker, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, alluded to the meeting on Wednesday, as the panel held a hearing on whether and how to overhaul the signature law of the global war on terrorism. 
  "I know we both attended sort of a discussion last night that I found to be one of the most bizarre I've attended on Foreign Relations on foreign policy in our country," Corker said at one point, referring to himself and Sen. Bob Menendez (D.-New Jersey), the committee's chairman. "I know several of us were involved in a very bizarre discussion last night. This continues a very bizarre discussion," Corker said at another point. The Tennessee Republican did not say where or with whom the meeting took place (or why it was bizarre). The White House later confirmed the meeting. National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said McDonough hosted "an informal discussion on national security issues," and that Rice and Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken attended. Now, consider that this is the administration really has no desire to hurt their fellow Muslim jihadists in the least. In fact, McDonough was intimately involved in the Benghazi coverup. However, in one of the most curious places for the truth to come out, The Daily Beast reported: …the White House has softened its earlier position, concluding that al Qaeda and its affiliates still represented a serious threat. But the tension between the White House and many top military and intelligence officials fighting the long war remain. In interviews with many of them, a common theme is sounded: The threat from al Qaeda is rising, but the White House is looking to ratchet down the war against these Islamic extremists. As a result, intelligence gathered on these threats remain shrouded from the public and, in many cases, from senior government officials. And now Congress and the White House are beginning to consider modifying—and possibly revoking—the very authority to find, fix and finish those terrorists who pose the threat today. Now, clearly we are not talking "Islamic extremists," but rather we are speaking of devout Muslims who are simply following the Qur'an, just as the founder of Islam did when he formed the political ideology. Also, keep in mind that it was the Obama administration that was claiming that al-Qaeda was on the run and that Osama bin Laden was dead. Again, it should come as no surprise seeing we have an administration involved in open treason, in which an impotent Congress will not impeach him. However, while Congress isn't calling Obama on this issue, many in the intelligence community are. 


What Happened to Thad? MISSISSIPPI PRIMARY




I wonder where OBAMA will be this
year? Playing golf? Shooting hoops? Smoking
Every year the French have a 4 day celebration in Normandy complete with American uniforms, tanks, jeeps and guns. They still honor the Americans who ied there.
In all the years since, Our country has only
FOUR TIMES not been there to do the honors.
Four times in 69 years!! I wonder who would have had the lack of respect to not honor our fighting forces?



June 6, 2013,
the 69th anniversary of "D-Day", the largest invasion ever attempted, where 200,000 Americans stormed the beaches at Normandy to begin the final push to defeat Nazi Germany in WWII. D-Day marked the turning point in WWII in Europe . Today, European heads of state make it a point to recall and honor the sacrifices of those who landed in Normandy , as do our
Presidents....well, most of them....
In the 69 years since D-Day, there are four occasions when the President of the United States chose not to visit the D-Day Monument that honors the soldiers killed during the Invasion.

The occasions were:
1. Barack Obama, 2010
2. Barack Obama, 2011
3. Barack Obama, 2012
4. Barack Obama, 2013

For the past 69 years, every American resident except Obama have taken the time to honor the memory and sacrifices of the 6,000 American
soldiers killed on D-Day. ...Except Obama!

June 6 2010, Obama had no events scheduled.

June 6, 2011, Obama met with the National
Security team and was interviewed by WEWS
Cleveland and WDIV in Detroit about the auto industry - FAR too busy to visit the D-Day

June 6, 2012, instead of honoring our fallen soldiers, Obama made a campaign trip to
California on Air Force 1 (at our expense) to
raise funds for (his) upcoming election.

June 6, 2013, Obama was doing ANOTHER fund raiser with the multimillionaires in the
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Palo Alto CA , once again at our

America - Aren't you proud?


By Chuck MacNab 

Nancy Pelosi, Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, has nominated her five Democrats to the committee to investigate Benghazi. In all likelihood, they have been given orders to do whatever it takes to disrupt the proceedings of the Committee and Trey Gowdy's mission to bring out ALL of the facts. Most likely the media will ally itself with the Democrats by broadcasting Ms Pelosi's comments about how the Democrats are trying to "be reasonable" when in fact they will be massively disruptive.  

Ms Pelosi undoubtedly passed the word that the Democrats might not participate and, of course, that caused a big stir and a lot of drivel came forth in the media, even on FOX News some of it surfaced. These days, the Democrats are telling everyone that black is white, white is black (for those pimple faced, lefty zealots, this is NOT a racist statement... got it!) and two and two equal zero. Democrats are panicking because, finally, fewer and fewer believe it! 
re trying desperate to find a place to hide on this issue. Many Democrats feel a real urge to denouce
Pelosi and her Democrats hold the view that the American people are stupid and they believe they can disrupt the Committee proceedings and provide a never ending stream of lies and propaganda to a friendly media always looking for a big story. One of their major "talking points" will be that the Republicans are on a witch-hunt and are just playing politics with the Benghazi disaster. We believe the American people are smarter than that and that Pelosi is playing with fire by placing her most proficient "disruptors" and propagandists on the Committee. If ALL of the facts are able to come out about Benghazi, we believe that the world will clearly see the corruption, incompetence and REAL HATRED of the military that exists throughout the Obama Administration. The VA debacle and the gutting of the Officer Corps are but the latest examples of that hatred coming to the surface.
Despite his politically obligatory statements of praise for the military, Obama and his closet military hater advisors, Michelle Obama, Valerie Jarrett and Hillary Clinton will be clearly seen by a majority of American voters and they will vote accordingly. That scares the shorts off of most Democrats and many are trying desprately to hide on the issue. Many Democrats feel a real urge to denounce the players in the Benghazi affair. The issue is a BIG loser for them and, we believe, no matter how disruptive the Democrats on the Committee will be (and we will see them trying to turn the hearings into a circus because that's what they have been instructed by Pelosi to do in trying to hide the truth and describe the proceedings as political, we believe voters will hold them accountable, big time, in November!
We say there was no way she would not nominate Democrats to be members of this Committee and the rampant speculation about non-participation should have been dismissed as soon as it appeared. She and her cadre of Democrat DISRUPTORS would never pass up a chance to be on the Committee if only for the purpose of attempting to make it a circus and mislead and destroy the investigation in the minds of voters. There was absolutely no way she would pass up that opportunity so the "non-participation" hogwash was just another of the many "ploys" that left wing radicals expect the public to gulp down whenever they put them on the media platter. Plainly it's a truckload of radical Democrat garbage thrown out to tempt voters to disregard the importance of all of these investigations.
Wouldn't it be nice to see more than 60 Republican votes in the Senate...So long Obamacare, hello impeachment, REAL investigations, with teeth, about the IRS, Fast and Furious, VA healthcare, trimming back of the EPA, the Education Dept., the Commerce Dept., budget cuts for all non-essential government agencies, real investigations into waste, and fraud, the stupidness of "climate change spending." etc., etc. Now that would be a REAL wake up call!
Why do we publish? We try to "motivate" politicians to disclose what they do in their secret meetings and closed door sessions by making information and commentary available to you so you can hold them accountable. We can't achieve that objective by being silent. (or by being a "doormat!") We are a nation of free people ...let's keep it that way.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...