Saturday, September 27, 2014

Sykes-Picot ? LET ME EXPLAIN !



sykes picot
Written by Suzanne Olden on September 24, 2014

I am a student of history. I love to study it, to see where we’ve been. It can tell us a lot about where we are going, and if we ignore it, how we get ourselves into holes that we’ve been in before. The Middle East is a quagmire that no one can seem to get out of, and the place where today’s issues can be pinpointed goes back just about 100 years.
Yes, I am completely aware that the Christian/Jew/Muslim history goes back millennia. The “it was the Crusades!” cries when trying to deflect today’s anger is actually kind of ridiculous and not accurate. Yes, Islam was violently taking over vast portions of the Middle East, including Jerusalem. Yes, they were attacking people who were either trading with the area or making religious pilgrimages there to visit holy sites. Yes Christians went there en masse to defend the “Holy Land”, its historical Christian/Jewish sites, as well as trade routes. Yes, it was bloody and horrible.
No, it wasn’t what the left would have us believe, and NO it isn’t the basis of what issues are in the area TODAY. The issues between Israel and the rest of the Middle East, the rise of ISIS and all the other conflicts can actually be placed solely at the feet of an Agreement called the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
Understanding the rise of terrorism, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda and ISIS (among others) depends on understanding exactly what happened before and after World War I and the Sykes-Picot Agreement. Glenn Beck did a program on The Blaze TV and nailed it quite well. 
 Before 1916, there was an Islamic Caliphate, the last one in existence, and it was the Ottoman Empire. It controlled the area completely and controlled key shipping routes. At that time Britain was a world power and controlled vast portions of the Near and Far East. Britain needed those routes, so it sent T.E. Lawrence, an Army Officer, to deal with the situation.
Yes, that’s the base character for the movie with Peter O’Toole called Lawrence of Arabia.
Lawrence was told that he had to get the Arabs in the area to fight against the Ottoman Empire. He was to promise them the world, or at least their world, to get their cooperation. He did. He promised them a new united Arab kingdom of greater Syria — which encompassed present day Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and parts of Iraq and Jordan. Great Britain never intended to honor that agreement, because they didn’t want a united area that could do exactly what the Ottoman’s were doing – control and shut down shipping routes. So, while they were negotiating with the Arabs, they were also negotiating with France about how to divide up the Middle East after the war.
The Sykes-Picot Agreement was the agreement with France that divvied up the area into smaller countries. After World War I, the Arabs had no choice but to accept the new model of nation states and it caused great resentment. Then the Brits threw in another wrench to the area, the British Mandate for Palestine: they set aside the area east of the Jordan River and it was called Transjordan; and the area west of it was a land for the Jewish people.
While I support a homeland for Jews, Israel, this was the gas on the fire that Arabs needed to focus on: the British pawns, the Jews. As Beck put it so well:
Remember, the British put together this partition — Transjordan and the Israeli state. So it was a two-state solution. It was split 56 percent Jewish, 43 percent Arab. 56 looks big, but much of the land’s not sufficient for crops, so it’s pretty close. Jerusalem, an international zone. The Jewish people accepted the plan. And if a Palestinian homeland was the goal for the Arab world — not the Palestinians, the Arab world — all they had to do was agree. But remember, the scapegoat goes away.

“The real goal … was uniting the Arab kingdom, one united Arab kingdom, a return of the Ottoman Empire, gaining control of greater Syria,” Beck said. “If you make peace with Israel, that all goes out the window. So when they were presented with what they said they always wanted, a nation of their own, they said no. And then all hell broke loose.”
It brought about the war in 1948 for Israeli independence. What is often not taught about this war is this (per Beck again):
Before the war broke out, Jordan made a secret deal with Israel. They wanted the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Jews weren’t promised this land in the UN partition, so they agreed to let Jordan take it. Jordan actually attacked Palestinian Arabs to get that land. Where is that in the history books? Egypt wanted southern Palestine. Iraq wanted the entire Fertile Crescent under their control, and Syria and Lebanon wanted northern Palestine where was the Palestinian state? You see, it wasn’t about freedom for the Palestinian Arabs, or the Jewish occupation. This war was what wars are always about — land, power, control. Israelis today remember it as the war of Independence. Palestinians call it the nakba, “catastrophe” …But when you actually know the history, the only catastrophe was when the Palestinians rejected their chance of a nation of their own, and then were sold out by their Arab neighbors.
Can we hear that again: Arabs sold out Arabs after they turned down the chance for their own nation. It wasn’t Jews taking it from them. They are just a convenient, and historical, fall guy.
Today, Sykes-Picot is a rallying cry for ISIS. If you remember, they are looking to reestablish the old Ottoman Empire and then some. They want what they were promised, and to go back to before 1916 all over again. To do that the area must be in chaos.
Back to Beck, since he explains it so well:
How do you get there? First thing you do, you have to destabilize the region. And how do you destabilize the region? What did Sykes-Picot do? Sykes-Picot made all of these new maps, and they drew new borders that had never been drawn before. And these borders put people who were never together under one rule, the British knowing that if they did that, it would take a strong man to keep them from fighting and killing each other.
To get rid of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, you have to go after the dictators and remove them. We Americans don’t like dictators, but as evil as they can be, they do keep peace in the area.
“Look at the map,” Beck said.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. … They’re doing nothing but remolding the map closer to their heart’s desire, and what they were promised 100 years ago. Now is their opportunity to achieve what they’ve always wanted from the very beginning: a return to a unified Arab kingdom. What a surprise, a caliphate. Islamic rule. There’s no judgment on this one way or another — this is just the fact. They want an end to the west and what the west created with Sykes-Picot. To get there, the best way to do it is to destabilize all these dictators, get them out of the way.
The Israelis and the Palestinians are now, as they have been for decades, a scapegoat. Don’t believe it? ISIS puts it rather plainly in this video:
Radical Islamists will never agree to a two state solution. They will use anyone, including the Jews and the Palestinians, to defeat it. Fortunately for them, hatred for anyone not Muslim can be a unifying rallying cry. Their goal, simply put, is to return the area to a caliphate, under their control.
There will be no end to the violence until this happens. History bears this out.

About the author: Suzanne Olden

Suzanne Reisig Olden is a Catholic Christian, Conservative, married mother of two, who loves God, family and country in that order. She lives northwest of Baltimore, in Carroll County, Maryland. She graduated from Villa Julie College/Stevenson University with a BS in Paralegal Studies and works as a paralegal for a franchise company, specializing in franchise law and intellectual property. Originally from Baltimore, and after many moves, she came home to raise her son and daughter, now high school and college aged, in her home state. Suzanne has written for the online publication, The Beacon Bulletin.

Friday, September 26, 2014

“The Terrorists R Us.” The Islamic State “Big Lie”


By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, September 25, 2014
Under the auspices of the United Nations Security Council, with president Obama chairing the Council session, the United States has called upon the international community to adopt strong measures, at national and international levels, to curtail the recruitment of Islamic State fighters.
What is not mentioned in the media reports is that the heads of State and heads of government who have endorsed America’s campaign against the Islamic State, advised by their respective intelligence services, are fully aware that US intelligence is the architect of the Islamic State and related Al Qaeda entities. Countries are either coerced into supporting the US sponsored resolution or they are complicit in the US terror agenda.

Lest we forget, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, have been financing and training the ISIL terrorists on behalf of the United States. Israel is harboring the Islamic State (ISIL) in the Golan Heights, NATO in liaison with the Turkish high command has since March 2011 been involved in coordinating the recruitment of the jihadist fighters dispatched to Syria. Moreover, the ISIL brigades in both Syria and Iraq are integrated by Western special forces and military advisers.
All this is known and documented, yet not a single head of state or head of government has had the courage to point to the absurdity of the US sponsored United Nations Security Council resolution, which was adopted unanimously on September 24.
“Absurdity” is an an understatement. What we are witnessing is a criminal undertaking under UN auspices.
While international diplomacy is often based on deception, US foreign policy lies are no longer credible. What we are witnessing is a total breakdown of established diplomatic practice. The “Forbidden Truth” is that the Islamic State is an instrument of Washington, a US ” intelligence asset”. ISIL is not an independent entity, nor is it an “outside enemy” which threatens global security, as conveyed by the Western media.
While everybody knows this, the big lie prevails. The Lie becomes the Truth.
The United Nations Security Council resolution calls upon member states to “suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting, equipping” and financing of foreign terrorist fighters,” Specifically, the resolution points to the the particular and urgent need to implement this resolution with respect to those foreign terrorist fighters who are associated with ISIL [Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant], ANF [Al-Nusrah Front] and other cells, affiliates, splinter groups or derivatives of Al-Qaida... But are these not precisely the “opposition freedom fighters” trained and recruited by the Western military alliance in their quest to unseat the government of Bashar Al Assad?

United Nations Security Council Meeting, september 24, 2014, chaired by president Obama
The ISIL are the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. Their unspoken mandate is to wreck havoc and destruction in Syria and Iraq, acting on behalf of their US sponsors. The endgame is to transform countries into territories.
John McCain with leaders of Al Qaeda entities in Syria
Political leaders present at the UN Security Council session applauded the US counter-terrorism initiative. France’s President Francois Hollande pointed to the fact that “terrorism has taken on another dimension, and it wants to conquer territory now.”
Several US allies including Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar which are currently involved in supporting ISIL and Al Nusrah are now involved in the US sponsored air raids allegedly targeted against the ISIL inside Syria.
Turkey and Jordan have borders with Syria. Saudi Arabia and Turkey have borders with Iraq. The direct military involvement of these countries points to a scenario of escalation and sectarian warfare extending from the Mediterranean to Central Asia.
In this regard, Turkey has already announced that it will be involved in ground operations inside Syria and Iraq. The newly-elected Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu announced (a day prior to the UN Security Council meeting) that his government will be seeking the endorsement of the Turkish Parliament to intervene militarily in both Iraq and Syria.
What is at stake is a so-called “no fly zone” in disguise, a justification to bomb Iraq and Syria under a counter-terrorism mandate, largely targeting the civilian population. The political architects of the Islamic State including president Obama, prime minister Cameron and their counterparts in France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, et al, are now waging a military campaign against the Islamic State, which they themselves created. Boots on the ground are also contemplated. According to Iraqi government sources, the US will be deploying sending ome 13000 troops to Iraq.
The leaders of western countries are either utterly ignorant and stupid, or totally corrupt and complicit? “The Terrorists R US.” Moreover, they seem totally unaware of the broad implications of their actions.
War propaganda is a criminal act under Nuremberg: Crime against the Peace. By upholding the lies and fabrications of US foreign policy, the mainstream media is complicit in war crimes.
Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron is to bring the matter to the British parliament. The revocation of citizenship is contemplated in Britain as well as in Canada for those suspected of supporting the jihadist movement. While Britain’s Prime minister has called upon Her Majesty’s government “to restrict or rescind the passports of British jihadists … Home Secretary Theresa May has threatened to deprive those Britons already fighting with the Islamic State of their citizenship.” ,
Ironically, at the same time Prime Minister Cameron is complicit in facilitating and organizing within the UK the recruitment of British jihadists. And indeed one might suggest, pending the formulation of criminal charges, that his passport should be revoked for “supporting the jihadist movement”.
George W. Bush stated in 2001, “you are either with us or with the terrorists.” The forbidden truth is that the US is involved in a diabolical undertaking: it has created an Islamic terror network with a view to destroying sovereign countries and now it is waging a war against its own terror network. Without media propaganda, this military agenda under the guise of counter-terrorism would fall flat, collapse like a deck of cards.
The US president and his indefectible British ally “R the Terrorists”, they are the “state sponsors of terrorism”, with a view to waging a war of conquest. The United Nations is complicit in this undertaking.
Copyright © 2014 Global Research

Caravan To Midnight - Episode 134 Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer on ISIS With John B. Wells



How unbelievably sad this is. And TRUE !

By Dennis Prager

I have been broadcasting for 31 years and writing for longer than that. I do not recall ever saying on radio or in print that a president is doing lasting damage to our country. I did not like the presidencies of Jimmy Carter (the last Democrat I voted for) or Bill Clinton. Nor did I care for the “compassionate conservatism” of George W. Bush. In modern political parlance “compassionate” is a euphemism for ever-expanding government.

But I have never written or broadcast that our country was being seriously damaged by a president. So it is with great sadness that I write that President Barack Obama has done and continues to do major damage to America. The only question is whether this can ever be undone.

This is equally true domestically and internationally.

Domestically, his policies have had a grave impact on the American economy.

He has overseen the weakest recovery from a recession in modern American history.

He has mired the country in unprecedented levels of debt: about $6.5 trillion in five years (this after calling his predecessor “unpatriotic” for adding nearly $5 trillion in eight years).

He has fashioned a country in which more Americans now receive government aid –- means-tested, let alone non-means-tested –- than work full-time.

He has no method of paying for this debt other than printing more money –- thereby surreptitiously taxing everyone through inflation, including the poor he claims to be helping, and cheapening the dollar to the point that some countries are talking about another reserve currency –- and saddling the next generations with enormous debts.

With his 2,500-page Affordable Care Act, he has made it impossible for hundreds of thousands, soon millions, of Americans to keep their individual or employer-sponsored group health insurance;he has stymied American medical innovation with an utterly destructive tax on medical devices; and he has caused hundreds of thousands of workers to lose full-time jobs because of the health-care costs imposed by Obamacare on employers.

His Internal Revenue Service used its unparalleled power to stymie political dissent. No one has been held accountable.

His ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were murdered by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya. No one has been blamed. The only blame the Obama administration has leveled was on a video maker in California who had nothing to do with the assault.

In this president’s White House, the buck stops nowhere.

Among presidents in modern American history, he has also been a uniquely divisive force. It began with his forcing Obamacare through Congress –- the only major legislation in American history to be passed with no votes from the opposition party.

Though he has had a unique opportunity to do so, he has not only not helped heal racial tensions, he has exacerbated them. His intrusions into the Trayvon Martin affair (“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon”) and into the confrontation between a white police officer and a black Harvard professor (the police “acted stupidly”) were unwarranted, irresponsible, demagogic, and, most of all, divisive.

He should have been reassuring black Americans that America is in fact the least racist country in the world –- something he should know as well as anybody, having been raised only by whites and being the first black elected the leader of a white-majority nation. Instead, he echoed the inflammatory speech of professional race-baiters such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. 

He has also divided the country by economic class, using classic Marxist language against “the rich” and “corporate profits.”

Regarding America in the world, he has been, if possible, even more damaging. The United States is at its weakest, has fewer allies, and has less military and diplomatic influence than at any time since before World War I. 

One wonders if there is a remaining ally nation that trusts him. And worse, no American enemy fears him. If you are a free movement (the democratic Iranian and Syrian oppositions) or a free country (Israel), you have little or no reason to believe that you have a steadfast ally in the United States.

Even non-democratic allies no longer trust America. Barack Obama has alienated our most important and longest standing Arab allies, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Both the anti–Muslim Brotherhood and the anti-Iran Arab states have lost respect for him.

And his complete withdrawal of American troops from Iraq has left that country with weekly bloodbaths.

Virtually nothing Barack Obama has done has left America or the world better since he became president. Nearly everything he has touched has been made worse.

He did, however, promise before the 2008 election that “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” That is the one promise he has kept.

Thursday, September 25, 2014

The Muslim Agenda - Full Movie Documentary


‘THE MUSLIM AGENDA’ is an NBT film production. Apparently there is a concerted effort to get the film removed from YouTube, so it would be better to watch it sooner rather than later. It is made up of six parts which together run for just under 2 hours. They can be watched together or separately. 
It gives a comprehensive picture of Islam in the UK and would be very useful to spread the word to those who are unaware. It’s a very well made film and includes excellent, if sometimes distressing, pictures and film footage (not suitable for young children). It is dedicated to the innocent victims who have been slain in the name of Islam. At 2 hours long it might be a lot to take in, but the individual sections would be less demanding to watch and absorb.
Part 1 - This part exposes the true nature of Islam and it's incompatibility with western ideals.
Part 2 - Islam 101, exposes the truth about Islam’s cult-like ideology and quotes directly from the Quran and Hadiths the sick doctrine of hate, intolerance and child molestation.…
Part 3 - The third part of the film exposes Sharia law and how incompatible the Islamic law is with western statutes. Sharia law is an oppressive system of intolerance, gender inequality, racial discrimination and permits child molestation.…
Part 4 - The fourth part of the film 'The Muslim Agenda' exposes jihad for what it really means. This chapter covers the culture of psychological indoctrination, guilt complex, and mind control which is imposed on young impressionable Muslim men.…
Part 5 - The final chapter of the film 'The Muslim Agenda' exposes the true agenda of the Islamic world. The end game and desire for all Muslims is a worldwide controlled caliphate whereby Sharia law is imposed on all mankind and forced subjugation of all non-Muslims must take place.…
Part 6 - This is a legitimate call for western legal systems to investigate the Islamic teachings in mosques and the contents of the Quran and Hadiths. After multiple home-grown terrorist attacks and foiled plots, it is our right as citizens to hold our governments accountable in investigating the doctrine of hate spread by Islam…

[I was particularly interested in this part. The following is a transcript of the narrative (which expands on the written notes in the film.) These are suggestions for inclusion in a legal enquiry. I would like to see halal slaughter included in the list.]
“Hopefully by now you fully understand the implications of such a diabolical mind-set and how Islam is no more than an aberration to the British way of life but it’s not for me to decide, this is a legal matter to be investigated thoroughly by the law makers of this land using in reference the statutory laws which have been in place since the birth of our great nation. Therefore to combat this insidious cult, I have drawn up a preliminary legal proposition on behalf of the sovereign nation of Great Britain for a safer and freer UK.
“Firstly it is in our best interests as British citizens to permanently abolish sharia law courts from our land. A wise man once said that a servant cannot serve two masters and likewise it is a ridiculous concept to have two legal systems established in the UK that oppose each other. Furthermore we have the right to question where our lawmakers’ loyalties lie when discriminative statutes have been created to suppress the UK from questioning Islam and wearing religious symbols of faith. The key word here being religion, which Islam is not.
“Secondly we must as a nation demand our leaders invoke a national and legal enquiry using our constitutional legal system into the content of the Quran especially in regards to sex slavery, bigamy laws, domestic violence and honour killings to determine with the inclusion of the teachings of Islamic clerics and their core text to probe their true agenda and to investigate if the cult of Islam violates our legal statutes protecting our citizens. If ultimately it is found that even in the slightest, even if one verse does violate our laws and poses a danger to UK citizens’ civil liberties then it is in our best interests to ultimately ban the Quran and Islam from the British Isles.
“During this time to take preliminary action, the government must invoke a national ban on Muslim groups handing out Islamic literature and to stop public proselytization. Consequently if the enquiry does in fact determine that the Quran does violate our democratic laws, even in the slightest, then ultimately we must demand new laws to be set in stone to ban sharia law by constitutional declaration from ever being established in the UK ever again.
“We as UK nationals and as tax payers reserve the right to demand our government uphold the legal right of UK citizens to carry or wear whatever religious symbols or apparel they may wish to as long as their religion is not a threat to the UK and is in fact a religion, not a political system. It is an absolute violation of the Discrimination Act to allow Muslims to wear burkas but to forbid Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs and other religions from wearing their own religious symbols and apparel.
“We must demand that the government remove halal taxation as the majority of UK citizens are non-Muslim and should not have to pay towards a cult movement which has no bearing on their life.
“We must demand stricter visa processing and tougher citizenship tests. This applies to non-Muslim and Muslim alike. The government and Department of Immigration must inform and enforce the law that successful applicants are obligated to integrate into British society and to swear a pledge of allegiance to Britain solely. Any new citizen who violates the terms and conditions of their citizenship, namely with anti-British hate speech, is to be charged with treason; revocation of citizenship and ultimately deportation. New citizens must renounce any affiliation to Muslim extremist groups. New citizens must abide by a 10 year probation programme. If they have been found to be conspiring in any way, whether it be attending an anti-British rally, meeting at a mosque or house with an agenda to conspire against the security of the UK will ultimately lead to revocation of citizenship. This proposed hard-line ruling is in fact now a reality in Holland and has been pushed hard on cowardly Muslim thugs to keep their country safe. Furthermore it should be demanded that premeditated attacks on British soil and citizens will and should ultimately lead to the reintroduction of the death sentence.
“We must demand that new citizens recognise that they are now British and British first, that all businesses and shops have their store-fronts written in English, after all, this is Great Britain.
“These are precarious times and true Muslims are taking advantage of our financial distraction, our growing apathy and detrimental libertarian groups who are ignorant of the true Muslim agenda. I have made this video not out of fear mongering but to alert you to the actual status of our country’s freedoms today. The truth is that Islam’s own policies and doctrines vilify itself making it impossible to stomach, yet ironically it still remains here in the UK. It is a desperate unit of thugs and malicious individuals posing as holy warriors clinging on to the democratic cloth of Great Britain. They are desperately trying to overthrow our ‘man made laws’ and invoke the ‘holy laws’ of their god.
“If we were to take a national survey of every non-Muslim man, woman and child in this country as to whether they approve of Islam’s presence in this country Muslims would be supremely outnumbered. The choice is yours, you can sit idly and watch your great nation swallow itself in political correctness or you can use this video as your voice. If you love your country, if you fear for the safety and prosperity of your children and grandchildren, you’ll make a stand. It is the right of every man, woman or child in this great nation, whether you are a Christian, a Hindu, a Buddhist or a Sikh or even an atheist, you have the right to stand up. This is your country too. If you love what your flag stands for you will help this video go viral. Share this video with as many people as you know. Post it on Facebook, twitter, blogs, bulletin boards, send it to your local television station, and write to your local Minister (MP?). You will demand the government address the aforementioned issues. The more views this video gets, the greater the chance we have of having our voice being heard. After all, you are a proud citizen of one of the few countries in the world with a proud heritage of democracy and we are not living in a completely fascist society yet; but if you don’t act soon, you will be. The choice is yours; I hope you make the right choice.” - NBT Film Channel




By Coach Dave Daubenmire
September 25, 2014

I am going to turn the tables on you today. I typically use my commentary to explain to the reader what I think is happening. Today, I would like to hear from you.
What is going on? Something is VERY wrong in America.
There cannot be a safer place to be in America than the White House. The Secret Service is legendary for its ability to protect the president.
Look. No matter how much we dislike the President, we all want to see he and his family protected. It should concern us when the Secret Service appears to have “dropped their guard.” If the President isn't safe, how can anyone be safe? This past weekend, two men jumped over the fence at the White House.
I have no proof, but I have to believe that they have the latest security gadgets...stuff so mind blowing that the average American wouldn't even believe it if you showed them.
I assume they have snipers on the roof. Cameras everywhere. Motion sensors and heat sensors. Foot patrols and guard dogs. Where were the SWAT teams? Supposedly the Secret Service has a “ring of security” 4 layers deep to prevent something like this from happening. Jumping the fence has been attempted 32 times in our history and no one has ever made it inside. It happened twice this week.
They have protocols that are so stringent that a Christian can't get anywhere near the place. In fact, I’m not even sure that Republican members of Congress can get a pass inside...especially if he has any relationship to the Tea party.
I have engaged in street ministry outside the White House fences, and the cops there are tyrants.
Yet twice in the past week, two dudes were able to climb over the fence and make their way into the White House? Reports say the doors weren't even locked. One of them made it to the stairwell that leads to the residence of the First Family. And no one noticed. Not one alarm went off. Not one shot was fired. Not one burly agent tackled them on the lawn. Not one barking dog was released.
What if he had been carrying a viral of Ebola? What if he had a bomb strapped on his body? What if he had been a member of ISIS?
One of the dudes, Omar Gonzalez, had come to the attention of the Secret Service twice this summer. If you are interested in the details read this. I am not interested in the details, but I sure wonder what the hell is going on. Can you tell me?
A year ago a young single mother in a car was shot dead by Secret Service agents when she was driving her car erratically in the area of the White House. She had a one-year old baby in the backseat. She was unarmed. Reports say as many as 7 officers opened fire on her. She was hit 5 the back.
She was killed over 2 MILES from the White House.
The media has given scant coverage to all three incidents. Last week, two different men jump the fence and ran INTO the White House and not a dog even barks...
Sharpton and Jackson have not barked about Miriam Carey either. They are too busy worrying about some black teenager in Missouri to fight for justice for single, black, unarmed, murdered-mother Miriam Carey.
This should trouble all of us regardless of your politics.
My dear friend Pastor James David Manning is asking the same question. Watch this short video.
Something is very wrong in America. Folks, something is very wrong.
Did someone give another “stand down” order? Why would the Secret Service allow their reputation to be soiled?
Has anyone been fired? Was anyone fired over the IRS probe? Was anyone fired over Benghazi? Why are so many military leaders being “retired?” Have the positions of power been overtaken? Are the agents fearful for their jobs...or even their lives?
Can someone please help me out here?

Democrats' Hypocrisy On Dark Money In Politics Exposed Again

 Dark Money In Politics Exposed Again

... As They Seek To Shut Down The Voice of "We the People"! 
Free Zone Media News Service - Again, news reports have exposed Democrats’ ongoing hypocrisy when it comes to spending on elections and the value of political speech. Politico writes today, “Democrats love to cast Republicans as the party of big money, beholden to the out-of-touch billionaires bankrolling their campaigns. But new numbers tell a very different story — one in which Democrats are actually raising more big money
" ... thanks to a spike in massive checks from increasingly energized labor unions and liberal billionaires like Tom Steyer and Fred Eychaner. . . .
“So … even as Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are working methodically to turn conservative megadonors like the big-giving conservative billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch into the boogeymen of 2014, the [Democratic] party itself is increasingly relying on its deepest pockets as the best chance of staving off a midterm wipeout forecast by oddsmakers.
“... Steyer, a retired San Francisco hedge fund billionaire, on Aug. 15 stroked a $15 million check to his own NextGen Climate Action super PAC that single-handedly exceeded the combined monthly total raised by the two GOP congressional campaign committees. And ... may give more to his super PAC than his $50 million pledge, ...”
Reid has spent months attacking the Kochs on the Senate floor, even declaring them “un-American,” and spending time on a radical constitutional amendment that would gut the core political speech protections of the First Amendment, all in service of Democrat complaints about money being used to speak in election campaigns.


Wednesday, September 24, 2014



Obama Forbids FBI to Use Religion in Identifying Terror Threats, as ISIS Recruits Openly in U.S. Mosques


AT had a chance to catch up with Steven Emerson, head of The Investigative Project on Terrorism, and hear his assessment of the ISIS threat here on American soil. Emerson runs the country's top data center on Islamic terror groups in the United States, working like a man possessed, and accomplishing the work of thousands on sheer guts and determination to protect our country.
Wherever the bad guys have been caught and prosecuted successfully, you will find Emerson working quietly behind the scenes as an invaluable ally of the FBI and Homeland Security. Because he accepts no money from the government, Emerson has been free of the diktats of the Obama administration that have forbidden the FBI to train their sights on Muslim terrorists. (That means The Investigative Project needs your help to continue its work.)
In the words of U.S. Representative Pete Hoekstra, Ranking Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence:
The Investigative Project on Terrorism is critical to our nation's security. There is no other non-governmental group that has better intelligence or data on the threat to the United States and our allies. Making do with a bare bones budget, the IPT is a national treasure whose influence and achievements are unparalleled.
It is not an exaggeration to say that because of Democrat political correctness hamstringing our FBI agents, they could not combat the Islamists in our midst without Steven Emerson. Oliver "Buck" Revell, former head of FBI Investigations and Counter-Terrorism, said as much in these words: "The Investigative Project has been one of the most important sources of accurate and timely information on the real goals and objectives of the wide spread and powerful Islamist movement."
The FBI turns to Emerson to find out what is happening. So does AT. This is what Emerson told us:
Isis is Al Qaeda 3.0. They are already in the United States and the only reason there has not been a terror attack is that they have not decided to do it yet.
The chief danger Steven Emerson sees is that there are three to four hundred ISIS killers in Syria and Iraq with American passports, who can return whenever they want, and the Obama administration is blocking the FBI from monitoring them in mosques. As Emerson told Judge Jeannine Pirro on Fox News:
The FBI has been handcuffed in terms of investigating religious extremists in mosques, as a result of guidelines put out by the attorney general earlier this year. And so therefore, there is… a definite problem now in investigating those militants in the United States who are either recruiting for ISIS or have returned from Syria or Iraq having fought for ISIS, and are ready to carry out freelance or directed terrorist attacks on behalf of ISIS against the United States…
the Department of Justice [which] put out guidelines that restricted the FBI and other law enforcement agencies from using religious factors in identifying threats, national security threats to the United States in the homeland.
…we're seeing ISIS recruiting biophysicists, engineers, social media types, people who have expertise in really carrying out sophisticated terrorist attacks coming back to the United States.
there's one recruiter that [had been]... picked up [in the past], well identified, in Bloomington, Minnesota at the Al Farooq Mosque. There are recruiters going around the country in other mosques, where they identify potential volunteers. They test them out to see if they're willing to die on behalf of martyrdom of the cause for Allah. Then they give them cash, they provide money for their families in case they die. They give them tickets to go to Turkey. Turkey has allowed them, hundreds, to go through to Syria, then to Iraq. And we [the U.S.] count Turkey as one of our top allies. We haven't put [many of] them on the terrorism watch list, which we should. So there's a major disconnect, Judge, here between what we should be doing to protect the homeland and protect American citizens.
Question for our Congress: Obama will do nothing to revoke the passports of American ISIS maniacs. What are you doing about it?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...