Saturday, July 18, 2015


Microagression, cancer, transgender courage, and the Chattanooga shooting are our topics this week on Louder with Crowder.

Is there a difference between treating someone with respect and respecting someone for who they are/their accomplishments? Is Caitlyn Jenner actually a hero? Why was the Chattanooga shooting almost immediately labeled domestic terrorism?

We’ve got the answers to all these questions… AND MORE. We’ve also have THE one and only Anthony Cumia, with an extended video edition of our conversation full of political incorrectness. You’re gonna loves it. Check it out:

Marine Sergeant Jeremy Knauff to Islamic State: You Will Learn Soon Enough of the Brotherhood of Marines


<br /><b>Warning</b>:  Illegal string offset 'alt' in <b>/home/freedomoutpost/public_html/wp-content/themes/politicsisdirty/fo-responsive-email-template.php</b> on line <b>217</b><br />h

Marine Sergeant Jeremy Knauff to Islamic State: You Will Learn Soon Enough of the Brotherhood of Marines

In the wake of Thursday's jihad attack on a military recruiting center in Chattanooga, Tennessee that left four United States Marines dead, one Marine says he has had enough and has gone to social media to inform the Islamic State, "You wanted attention, and yesterday, you got it. Only, you chose the wrong people to seek that attention from." He was talking about the United States Marines.
Marine Sergeant Jeremy L. Knauff, who served honorably in the United States Marine Corps for four years after graduating from high school, took to Facebook to rip the weakness of Barack Obama and how all the jihad attack has done is paint the target even bigger on those tied to the religion of pieces.
"You did not get the attention of our weak President," Knauff wrote. "He tweeted his support for your medieval holiday following your cowardly attack. You did not get the attention of our useless and corrupt Congress. They were too busy lining their pockets."
"When you attacked those four Marines, you got the attention of every one of our 186,800 active duty Marines, along with every Marine who ever served," he continued. "You just stirred up hate, discontent, and malice within a group of people who relish the idea of engaging the enemy."
Knauff, who manages Sartapn Media, then wrote:

There is something you obviously don't yet know about Marines...

The brotherhood we share is stronger than the challenges we face, the weapons we master, or the enemies we destroy.

You will learn that soon though.
In pointing out the current Rules of Engagement per the Obama administration, which has gotten many of our military killed, Knauff says that isn't the way it will work when Islamists come to America. 
"You see, we won't play by the rules you're accustomed to seeing," he wrote. "When you play in our backyard, we don't have to answer to any chain of command. We will not follow ridiculous ROEs crafted by a spineless bureaucrat to appease some goat herding tribal leader. And we won't be wearing uniforms so that you can easily ambush us. Nope. None of that shit."
"When you think you're walking into a target-rich environment, you're really walking into an ambush," he continued. "That pudgy, middle-aged guy wearing khakis in the mall, who unbeknownst to you, is a former 0311 and armed, will dump your sorry ass before you have a chance to scream 'allah snackbar.' And that soccer mom pushing a stroller, she's got a Glock and will happily leave you gasping in a pool of your own blood before she lets you hurt her children."
"We are here and we still have the training and experience to wage war, whether here or abroad," he added. "And wage war we will. Every one of us are willing to fight and die to protect our Marine Corps brothers and sisters, our families and friends, and our way of life."
"And we will win, because while you fight to destroy what you hate, we fight to protect what we love," he concluded. "Semper Fi!"
Indeed, I love when someone tells it like it is. There is no question that many of us have had it up to here (raises my hand way about my head) with Islamists who think they can engage in jihad without consequences.
Marine veteran Nick Powers has already put out the warning to the Islamic State: "Attack us and there will be no mercy." Knauff is just confirming that same heart and spirit, the spirit of the Marines… the spirit of America.













GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump has repeatedly accused President Barack Obama of negotiating with the Iranian regime out of desperation. His argument was that Obama was willing to do anything to secure a deal.
It turns out that Trump spoke truthfully. Only hours after Obama finally reached a deal with Iran, Secretary of State John Kerry begged Iran to release three Americans — Robert Levinson, Amir Hekmati, and Saeed Abedini — that it has been holding hostage for quite some time.
This raised a fundamental question, one that, according to The Hill, Trump brought up while speaking with Fox News yesterday.
“We have four people over there, prisoners that they’re keeping — hostages, whatever you want to call them — that’s not part of the deal,” he said. “Why isn’t that part of the deal?”
The deal contained a litany of concessions to the Iranian regime but absolutely nothing for the United States and its allies.

Quit Bashing Obama! by COL. ROBERT F. CUNNINGHAM and PATRICK RISHOR, The Gilmer Mirror (Northeast Texas Newspaper)


There must be a reason why  he was elected the President of the US of A !
  Quit Bashing Obama!    by COL. ROBERT F. CUNNINGHAM and PATRICK RISHOR,  The Gilmer Mirror (Northeast Texas Newspaper)
    Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:

    1.   First President to be photographed smoking a joint.
    2.   First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
    3.   First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
    4.   First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.
    5.   First President to violate the War Powers Act.
    6.   First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
    7.   First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
    8.   First President to spend a trillion dollars on "shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as "shovel-ready" jobs.
    9.   First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
    10.   First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
    11.   First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
    12.   First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
    13.   First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.
    14.   First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.
    15.   First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.
    16.   First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
    17.   First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
    18.   First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.
    19.   First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.
    20.   First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
    21.   First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
    22.   First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).
    23.   First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
    24.   First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
    25.   First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.
    26.   First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office.
    27.   First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.
    28.   First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
    29.   First President to go on multiple "global apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours.
    30.   First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.
    31.   First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
    32.   First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
    33.   First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.
    34.   First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.
    35.   First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).
    36.   First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences."
    37.   Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.
    I feel much better now. I had been under the impression he hadn't been doing ANYTHING.


INDEPTH STUDY : VIDEO AT BOTTOM OF STORY: WHY DON'T WE JUST FIRE UP THE OVENS AND BE LIKE HITLER ? Princeton Professor says the Government Should Use Obamacare to Kill Disabled Infants!

 Down's Syndrome
professor’s views on abortion and infanticide (nice words for Child Murder)

By Onan Coca / / 
Princeton University was once upon a time a haven for Christian morality and ethics, a place where young men would go and be trained to serve God and teach the Bible to others. Now the esteemed college in New Jersey is a place that gives sanctuary to sick and twisted “educators” like supposed “ethics” professor Peter Singer.
World Net Daily is reporting that last weekend Singer gave a radio interview with Aaron Klein Investigative Radio where they discussed the professor’s views on abortion and infanticide (nice words for Child Murder). The conversation was supposed to focus on the professor’s latest book but turned to these heinous topics when the host wondered what Singer thought of health-care rationing (death panels) under Obamacare.
Professor Singer argued that rationing was already happening in US hospitals (though to a lesser extent than in Europe): “It’s different in the U.S. system, in a way, because it doesn’t do this overtly; maybe it doesn’t do it as much. And the result is it spends about twice as much on health care as some other countries for very little extra benefit in terms of the outcome.” Klein then quoted from another Singer book where he opines that “non-voluntary euthanasia” (which many of us would just call murder) is morally acceptable when the person being euthanized cannot understand the choice between life and death, including for “severely disabled infants, and people who through accident, illness, or old age have permanently lost the capacity to understand the issue involved.”
Down's Syndrome 
Professor Singer also expects that denying treatment to disabled infants will become much more common under Obamacare. “It does happen. Not necessarily because of costs.
If an infant is born with a massive hemorrhage in the brain that means it will be so severely disabled that if the infant lives it will never even be able to recognize its mother, it won’t be able to interact with any other human being, it will just lie there in the bed and you could feed it but that’s all that will happen, doctors will turn off the respirator that is keeping that infant alive.
I don’t know whether they are influenced by reducing costs. Probably they are just influenced by the fact that this will be a terrible burden for the parents to look after, and there will be no quality of life for the child.
So we are already taking steps that quite knowingly and intentionally are ending the lives of severely disabled infants.
And I think we ought to be more open in recognizing that this happens.”
 This response led to Klein’s next question:
“I know that it happens and it happens certainly if the family gives consent. But do you think in the future in order to ensure a more fair rationing of health-care and health-care costs, that it should actually be instituted more? The killing of severely disabled babies?”
Singer responded with what may terrifyingly be the common answer in the not-to-distant future: I think if you had a health-care system in which governments were trying to say, “Look, there are some things that don’t provide enough benefits given the costs of those treatments. And if we didn’t do them we would be able to do a lot more good for other people who have better prospects,” then yes.
I think it would be reasonable for governments to say, “This treatment is not going to be provided on the national health service if it’s a country with a national health service. Or in the United States on Medicare or Medicade.”
And I think it will be reasonable for insurance companies also to say, “You know, we won’t insure you for this or we won’t insure you for this unless you are prepared to pay an extra premium, or perhaps they have a fund with lower premiums for people who don’t want to insure against that.”
Because I think most people, when they think about that, would say that’s quite reasonable. You know, I don’t want my health insurance premiums to be higher so that infants who can experience zero quality of life can have expensive treatments.
Look for arguments like this to begin going mainstream in the coming years as Americans begin realizing that socializing medicine MUST lead to rising health care costs. Every nation on earth that has nationalized their healthcare has also been forced to institute some method of “rationing” to help keep costs down. It will start with abortion and euthanasia of the elderly or those facing terminal illness, but will eventually creep into other subgroups like the mentally and physically disabled. Professor Singer (and liberal defenders of socialized medicine) argue that it is moral to kill the weak to benefit the strong. We conservatives must stand for the most defenseless among us and shout the truth from the rooftops – though liberals may disagree, we are not animals and it is therefore the moral duty of the strong to defend the weak.

Abortion and Infanticide: Peter Singer debates Don Marquis


Chattanooga jihad murderer worked at nuclear power plant



What could possibly have gone wrong?
 “Chattanooga shooter worked at Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Medra Marketing,” WKYC, July 17, 2015 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — The man who opened fire at two military facilities in Chattanooga, killing four Marines and injuring three others, is Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez.
WKYC has confirmed that he worked and lived for a time in Northeast Ohio.
FirstEnergy confirmed to WKYC’s Investigator Tom Meyer that he also worked at Perry Nuclear Power Plant from May 20 to May 30 of 2013.
FirstEnergy said he left because he didn’t meet the minimum requirements to remain employed. He worked as a electrical engineer right outside the nuclear reactor, which they say he did not have access.
Ashley Castillo, a manager at Medra, a marketing company in Independence, said he did work for the company…

Friday, July 17, 2015

im' sorry : do i need to explain this ?





His dizzy aunt ----------------------------------------------- Verti Gogh

The brother who ate prunes------------------------------- Gotta Gogh

The brother who worked at a convenience store ------ Stop N Gogh

The grandfather from Yugoslavia ----------------------------- U Gogh

His magician uncle -------------------------------- Where-Diddy Gogh

His Mexican cousin ---------------------------------------- A Mee Gogh

The Mexican cousin's American half-brother ------------ Gring Gogh

The nephew who drove a stage coach --------------- Wells-Far Gogh

The constipated uncle ------------------------------------- Can't Gogh

The ballroom dancing aunt -------------------------------- Tang Gogh

The bird lover uncle -------------------------------------- Flamin Gogh

An aunt who taught positive thinking ------------------ Way-to-Gogh

The little bouncy nephew ----------------------------------- Poe Gogh

A sister who loved disco -------------------------------------- Go Gogh

And his niece who travels the country in an RV ------ Winnie Bay Gogh

I saw you smiling . . .. there ya Gogh



MH17 One Year On: What Really Happened and Why

PHPatrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire

This month marks the one year anniversary of the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 – an incident that took place against a backdrop of a brutal proxy war – pitting Kiev and its supporters in Washington DC, the EU and NATO – against rebel forces in eastern Ukraine and Russia. As with most 21st century conflicts, truth has been the first casualty of war here.

Last July, 21WIRE released its own preliminary investigation into the disaster. That post still remains one of the most successful articles in the site’s history. One year on, we’ll revisit and review many of those key points and attempt many of the reamining unanswered questions…

On July 17, 2014, flight MH17 traveling east from Amsterdam, Netherlands to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – crashed near the village of Grabovo, and on the outskirts of the town of Torez just outside of Donetsk in eastern Ukraine, approximately 40 km from the Ukrainian-Russian border.
To call this situation volatile would almost be an understatement. A pivotal event such as this could easily be used as  a pretext for escalating not only a New Cold War between the West and Russia, but also a hot war. Only six months previously, the Ukraine found itself in the throws of a western-backed coup d’état in Kiev which tore the country apart. This was quickly followed by a snap referendum in Crimea, where voters opted for secession from the Ukraine and into the relatively secure arms of the Russian Federation. The west cried foul and so began a new grudge match. Arguably, tensions between the west and Moscow have been at their highest since the apex of the Cold War during the east-west Soviet era. Needless to say, with MH17 the stakes could not be any higher, and regarding the west, it was obvious who would be assigned the blame for this tragedy.
More than any other incident, this one was flushed out firstly through public relations channels, and then secondly through official government bodies. From the onset the West took its position by claiming it had “proof” that ‘Russian-backed rebels’ were responsible for shooting down the passenger airliner. Immediately after the incident took place, the western government-media complex insisted that the murder weapon was a Russian-made BUK Surface to Air Missile system.

Buk-M1-2_9A310M1-2A Russian-made BUK SAM Missile battery, commonly stocked by the Ukrainian Army (Image: Wikicommons)

Western mainstream media outlets wasted no time in disseminating this government-issued conspiracy theory, backed-up by a number of other clams of “evidence” coming out of the Washington-backed regime in Kiev. At the time, US Secretary of State John Kerry claimed to have a “mountain of evidence” convicting ‘pro-Russian separatists’ and Moscow. Unfortunately, Kerry’s mountain was no more than a mole hill. Nearly all of those claims have since been debunked and exposed as fraudulent – but from a public opinion perspective, the damage was already done.

Within 48 hours, News Corp and other pro-war rags ran a series of loaded headlines including, “Putin’s Missile”, “Putin’s Victims” and “From Vlad to Worse”. Vladimir Putin and his government in Russia were already convicted in the Kangaroo court of public opinion under the guise of guilt by association with Russian speaking rebels under siege by Kiev’s military forces.

‘Factless’ News Corp: Always the loyal war rag.
However, upon closer examination of the facts surrounding this case, an alternative set of conclusions can be drawn from this event – one which points to the very strong possibility that what the world really witnessed last year was a classic ‘false flag’ event – an attempted slight-of-hand bit of military trickery designed to cast blame on one party for a crime that was really committed by another. It wouldn’t be the first time that this type of sub-plot was put into motion to advance a world power’s geopolitical objectives.

Revelation of the Method: A ‘False Flag’ Attack
The term false flag, or “black flag”, is most common in naval battles, and describes the historic covert, military use of a flag other than the perpetrator’s true flag colors as a type of ruse de guerre – designed to deceive and confuse in order to provide a fake ‘moral high ground’ in the theater of mass public opinion.
The classic blueprint for MH17 was not dreamt-up by Russian war planners, but by the Pentagon – over 50 years earlier. A clandestine plan known as Operation Northwoods, was similarly conjured in 1962 by the US Department of Defense’s Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and the CIA in front of a Cold War backdrop pitting the United States against then Soviet ally Cuba, led by Fidel Castro. The plan was signed off by then JCS Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and detailed how spooks would use prepositioned explosives to blow-up a passenger airliner over Cuba, blaming it on Cuba and by extension – Washington’s arch-nemesis the Soviet Union. This ‘false flag’ attack would then be used as valuable leverage in a global public opinion campaign against Washington’s existential and ideological enemies. They also talked about developing a “Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”. Fortunately, the deceptive plot was eventually rejected by the Kennedy administration.




Iran Deal to Be Sent to UN Security Council Before Congress: A Deliberate Insult by the President

International commentary

(Photo: Sipa USA/Newscom)
According to news reports, the Obama administration is currently circulating a draft United Nations Security Council resolution to implement the commitments agreed to under the Iran nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
The expectation among other Security Council member states is that the U.S. will seek a vote on the resolution in the Security Council in the near term before Congress has had an opportunity to review and act on the agreement as outlined in the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, which President Obama signed into law.
The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 states the during the review period, the “President may not waive, suspend, reduce, provide relief from, or otherwise limit the application of statutory sanctions with respect to Iran under any provision of law or refrain from applying any such sanctions.”
U.N. Security Council sanctions are not U.S. statutory sanctions, but the clear intent of the legislation is to prevent any sanctions relief until Congress has reviewed the deal.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, states that it will result in the “comprehensive lifting of all U.N. Security Council sanctions as well as multilateral and national sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear programme” and that “[p]romptly after the conclusion of the negotiations of this JCPOA, the proposed U.N. Security Council resolution referred to in Section 18 of this Annex will be submitted to the U.N. Security Council for adoption without delay.”
No doubt the Obama administration justifies its haste on these provisions of the JCPOA. But “promptly” and “without delay” do not necessarily mean immediately.
Indeed, all negotiating parties are aware of the Obama administration’s commitment to give Congress time to review the deal. It is reasonable to argue that promptly means immediately after the procedures outlined in the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 are complete.
The parties have negotiated this deal for well over a year breaking numerous deadlines, what are a few more weeks at this point? The clear intent is to give the impression of inevitability and pressure Congress not to, in the words of President Obama, veto “the judgment of 99 percent of the world community.”
A matter of this significance deserves careful deliberation. Once the Security Council takes action on this matter, it will rescind seven painstakingly negotiated Security Council resolutions adopted over the past decade.
It will also start the clock on a cascade of sanctions relief commitments by the U.S. and the European Union.
Once started, the possibility of re-erecting this sanctions framework is vanishingly small. Even if the snapback provisions in the agreement work as described, given the incentives for key parties and commercial interests to avoid re-imposition of sanctions, they will only be viable after proof of Iranian violations are grossly evident.
Meanwhile, more than $100 billion in frozen Iranian assets will be released over the next year.
Moreover, the terms of the provision would “not apply with retroactive effect to contracts signed between any party and Iran or Iranian individuals and entities prior to the date of application.”
In other words, the sanctions snapback would only apply to activities occurring after it is triggered—everything prior is exempted. Investments and agreements adopted prior to the snapback will, presumably, continue unabated and unaffected.
Going to the Security Council prior to congressional consideration signals the administration’s intent to proceed regardless of whether Congress supports or opposes the agreement. Although within the executive’s authority as the U.S. representative on the Security Council, such an action would be a deliberate insult to Congress and a breach of the president’s commitment to work with Congress on this matter.
As stated by Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, in a letter to the president, “It is distressing that your administration would afford Russia and China the opportunity to vote on the final agreement before the American people’s representatives do. The full 60-day review period and parliamentary procedures prescribed by the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act should be allowed to play out before action at the Security Council.”
Hopefully, the president will heed this advice, but unfortunately the president has demonstrated repeatedly that he will circumvent Congress at every opportunity.
Reportedly, the administration again wants to circumvent the treaty process to implement a climate change agreement to be finalized this December.
If Congress wants to be taken seriously as a co-equal branch of government, it needs to reject this fatally flawed Iran deal and use its power of the purse to rebuke and limit the administration when it oversteps.



CLUES EMERGE: Tenn. gunman became more devout in recent weeks

THE MAN ACCUSED of killing four Marines when he attacked two military sites in Chattanooga had recently grown a beard, begun attending Friday prayers at a local mosque, and published two blog posts earlier this week containing musings about Islam, but not mentioning ISIS or any other terror group.


 Dry Bones cartoon, Kirschen, Iran, agreement,Nukes,America,Churchill, war,Nazi,

Five Doctors Meet Untimely and Suspicious Deaths in Past Month – Five More Still Missing


Katy Whelan, health reporter at The Common Sense Show, wrote earlier this week, "Death is part of life. It happens everyday, everywhere, in every manner. Multiple deaths of people associated with the same line of work is generally not enough to raise alarm bells in my book. When you see cluster deaths in high level professions or those in a field of work that bucks the system, challenge the status quo or threaten the fat cats of billion dollar corporations, then you may want to sit up and take notice."
As of today, there has been string of five doctor deaths.
The Free Though Project reports:
Two weeks ago, the string of mysterious deaths began when haDr. Jeff Bradstreet MD was found in a river with a gunshot wound to his chest. The police claim tt the gunshot wound was self-inflicted and that the death was a suicide, however, Bradstreet's family suspects foul play.

Another death came on Father's Day, June 21, when Dr. Bruce Hedendal DC Ph.D., of the Miami area, was found dead in his car with no explanation as to how it happened. As of right now, there are even fewer details about the circumstances surrounding Hedenal's death as there are about the death of Bradstreet.

To make matters even more suspicious, both doctors have had run-ins with the feds due to their unconventional treatments, which had been known to help people. In fact, just weeks before his death Bradstreet's office was raided by the FDA.

If two dead doctors in the same field, and same region of the country in such a short time span was not suspicious enough, Dr. Teresa Sievers, another natural health doctor from Florida, also died under mysterious circumstances earlier this week. According to Sievers' website, she also specialized in holistic health treatments. She was allegedly murdered by an unknown attacker in an upscale neighborhood that experiences very little crime.

On Monday Lisa Riley, a doctor of Osteopathic from Lee County, Georgia was found dead with a gunshot wound to the head. While she is not a similar type of doctor to the other three above, her death remains unsolved as to whether or not foul play was involved.

A 33-year-old holistic doctor from Florida was found dead. Dr. Baron Holt, DC also died on Father's Day on the East Coast of Florida, which was the same day of death as Dr. Bruce Hedendal.
Additionally, Erin Elizabeth also reported that five more doctors have gone missing. On the same day that Dr. Bradstreet was found, three US doctors, who were traveling to to Mexico were reported missing.
Elizabeth also points out:
June 26th, Dr. Patrick Fitzpatrick MD goes missing. He was traveling from North Dakota to neighboring Montana (which he did often as his son lived in Montana) and his truck and trailer were found on the side of the road. Searches have expanded, but authorities say it's like he vanished without a trace. He's 6′ tall, described as Irish with a goatee and details can be found on the links.


June 29th, Jeffrey Whiteside MD a pulmonologist went missing, vanishing when he simply "walked away."  Dr Whiteside, known for his successful treatment of lung cancer, disappeared in Door County Wisconsin while vacationing with family. They say he was on foot and had no vehicle and numerous reports call it "mysterious" saying he too vanished without a trace. They've been searching now 2 weeks and even colleagues have joined in (along with many bloodhounds, drones search parties and helicopters) but not a shred of evidence in 2 weeks.

Is something sinister going on? It does sound a bit strange that several of these doctors have had run ins with the Obama administration's federal agents before their untimely deaths and several of them have also been outspoken critics of vaccines, something advanced by many of the socialists and Marxists in our society.


FBI raids Chattanooga jihadi’s house, two women led out in handcuffs


A widening plot? “LIVE UPDATES: FBI raids shooting suspect’s house, two women led out in handcuffs,”  Times Free Press,July 16, 2015:
The FBI is investigating two brazen attacks on military facilities in Chattanooga in which four Marines were killed, leading to lockdowns at the Army Recruiting Center on Lee highway as well as the Naval and Marine Reserve Center at the Chattanooga Riverpark, as well as local hospitals.
The attacks, which were mere minutes apart, began when a single shooter, identified as 24-year-old Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez, drove a silver Ford Mustang convertible to a Lee Highway recruiting center at 10:45 a.m and fired more than a dozen rounds into the building. After his initial barrage, he led responding police officers on a high-speed chase down Amnicola Highway to a second military installation, where he opened fire again and was killed after a gun battle that one witness estimated lasted 20 minutes.
Three victims were rushed to Erlanger’s Trauma Center, including a Chattanooga police officer and two members of the military. One of those patients was discharged from Erlanger this afternoon; the other two are still being treated. Including the victim, the violence claimed five lives, with three more wounded.
Officials have said the shooter died during the attack, though they did not say how he died. During the attack on Amnicola Highway, numerous Chattanooga and Hamilton County officers “actively and enthusiastically” engaged the suspect, said Chattanooga Police Chief Fred Fletcher.
The motive behind the attack, which the FBI said came without warning, is still under investigation. A U.S. official said there was no indication Abdulazeez was on the radar of federal law enforcement before the shootings, according to the Associated Press….
U.S. Attorney Bill Killian said during a press conference that he would classify the violence as an “act of domestic terrorism.”
Witnesses at both the Amnicola and Lee Highway sites reported hearing multiple gunshots in each case, with the installation at Amnicola Highway seeing the bulk of the violence. Shortly after the shooting, blue markers littered the ground outside the recruiting station on Lee Highway where shots were fired, and police completely blocked off Amnicola Highway to traffic.
A photo taken after the attack from a helicopter and posted on Twitter showed the shooter’s Ford Mustang with doors opened, parked next to a bent gate that was positioned in such a way that it appeared to have been rammed by his vehicle.
A sign on the outside of the Lee Highway location had a “no guns allowed” sign posted. During the news conference, the FBI confirmed that guns were generally prohibited at federal facilities.
Carolyn Taylor, who works at Binswanger Glass across Amnicola Highway from the incident site, said she heard what sounded like over 100 gunshots….
Abdulazeez was believed to have been born in Kuwait, and it was unclear whether he was a U.S. or Kuwaiti citizen. It was not immediately clear whether the gunman’s first name was spelled Muhammad or Mohammad.
Abdulazeez is from Hixson, Tennessee, which is just a few miles across the river from Chattanooga. He was booked for a DUI in April 2015. A man named Youssuf Abdulazeez attended UTC, spokesman Chuck Cantrell said, and graduated in 2012 with a degree in engineering.
Abdulazeez was a student intern for TVA five years ago while he was at UTC. He did not work at either of the facilities he attacked, according to the FBI.
He wrestled in high school and became an MMA fighter afterward, according to Ryan Smith, who was a year behind Abdulazeez at Red Bank High School. Abdulazeez’s family was very religious, Smith said. The women in Abdulazeez’s family wore traditional Islam head coverings, Smith said.
A reporter saw a SWAT team and FBI agents staging at a strip mall in Hixson near the shooter’s house. The house, which Hamilton County records is owned by Youssuf S. Abdulazeez, is appraised at $206,100 by the Hamilton County Assessor of Property. Police in Hixson kicked a reporter out of the neighborhood that contained a house apparently owned by Abdulazeez. However, the Associated Press reported that two women were led out in handcuffs.
Abdulazeez allegedly killed four Marines and shot one police officer in the attack at Amnicola Highway. A soldier and a police officer were wounded in the attack, according to the Associated Press. Dennis Pedigo, a Chattanooga police officer, is in stable condition.
Abdulazeez’s father, Youssuf Abdullazeez, was appointed as a “special policeman” for Chattanooga’s Department of Public Works in March 2005.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...