Saturday, March 19, 2016

Ammon Bundy and The Principle of Civil Disobedience (#237) by Rick Koerber | Mar 20, 2016 | FCP Brain-On Lounge, Free Capitalist Radio

Ammon Bundy and The Principle of Civil Disobedience (#237)
SALT LAKE CITY, UT (FCP) – “You should thank God that there are cowboys up in Oregon who showing the principled path to civil disobedience.” A lot of attention is being given to Ammon Bundy and his associates up in Oregon. In this special video broadcast of Free Capitalist Radio Rick addresses “the principled path of civil disobedience.” Video is below.
Host: Rick Koerber. Free Capitalist Radio, Episode #237. Originally broadcast January 24, 2016.



This morning I went to sign my dogs up for welfare.
At first the lady said, "Dogs are not eligible to draw welfare." So I explained to her that my dogs
are mixed in color, unemployed, lazy, can't speak English and have no frigging 
clue who their Daddy's are. They expect me to feed them, provide them with
housing and medical care. So she looked in her policy book to see what it takes
to qualify. My dogs get their first checks Friday!.....This is a great country!!!

PS: Now I'm looking for a Chihuahua. The Welfare lady
said Mexicans get extra



With the advancement of digital technology and the rise of internet videos, we are seeing a significant influx of fakes and hoaxes. Many people are deceived as it causes much confusion and takes away from the real paranormal investigators. Should these scammers be prosecuted, since it may be affront to national security? On tonight’s show, Clyde Lewis talks about ‘JUSTICE FOR THE ALIENATED!’

Caravan To Midnight - Episode 490 John Hunt & Hagmann & Hagmann

Episode 490 – In this edition we welcome friends of the Caravan; first Saint John Hunt joins us to disclose how war was made into big business. Then Doug and Joe Hagmann come on board we discuss employing critical thinking, survey GOP updates, postulate future projections and much more.

Donald J. Trump: The Long Road to the White House (1980 - 2015) (NO PIANO!)


Friday, March 18, 2016



George Carlin - Political Correctness is fascism pretending to be Manners..................

Comedian and social commentator George Carlin prophesied liberals would stretch political correctness to the point that it would strangle the English language, the exact scenario playing out today.
Reading from his book, “When Will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops,” Carlin touches back on a topic covered in his previous work, “Brain Droppings,” and warns political correctness poses a massive threat to free speech.
“Political correctness is America’s newest form of intolerance, and it is especially pernicious because it comes disguised as tolerance. It presents itself as fairness, yet attempts to restrict and control people’s language with strict codes and rigid rules. I’m not sure that’s the way to fight discrimination. I’m not sure silencing people or forcing them to alter their speech is the best method for solving problems that go much deeper than speech.”

VIDEO -“Trump Meets the Honeymooners” is back with this parody of The Munsters. We especially like #TedCruz as Grandpa and "little" #MarcoRubio as Eddie!!!



10 Things Judge Jeanine Loves About the Candidate She’s Endorsing for President


As anyone who’s watched Fox News’s “Justice with Judge Jeanine” knows, host Jeanine Pirro isn’t shy about stating her opinion. And one thing she hasn’t been silent about is her full-throated endorsement of one Republican presidential candidate, in particular.
Since she endorsed billionaire real estate magnate Donald J. Trump for President on February 1st, she definitely made sure people get her reasons why.
Here are 10 things that Judge Jeanine loves about Donald Trump.

1. He thwarts the wishes of the Washington establishment class.

“Here’s the bottom line: The establishment is scared.”
She added on Twitter:

2. He is waaaaaay better than Mitt Romney…and will turn out the vote.

Daily Mail reported that Pirro went after Mitt Romney after the former Massachusetts governor and GOP presidential nominee made comments which were critical of Trump, contrasting the two:
“Donald Trump is bringing in record numbers of Americans. He is doing more to add to our ranks than any of your anemic get-out-the-vote operations.”

3. He’s a good dad.

NEW YORK, NY - JUNE 16: (L-R) Eric Trump, Lara Yunaska Trump, Donald Trump, Barron Trump, Melania Trump, Vanessa Haydon Trump, Kai Madison Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Donald John Trump III, and Ivanka Trump pose for photos on stage after Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the U.S. presidency at Trump Tower on June 16, 2015 in New York City. Trump is the 12th Republican who has announced running for the White House. (Photo by Christopher Gregory/Getty Images)
Image Credit: Christopher Gregory/Getty
In an interview with Donald Trump on her TV show in October 2015, Pirro said that Trump has “an incredible relationship with all of [his] kids”

4. They have a close, long-lasting friendship.

Pirro told WGN Radio that their families “have been friends for 30 years.”

5. He’s a natural.

“Think about it, this guy’s running for President, has no political experience, and yet he can get our attention.”

6. He has a strong work ethic.

“He works like a dog. I’ve never seen anyone work as hard as he does.”

7. She agrees with him.

“He’s a fascinating guy who I happen to agree with most of the time.”

8. He can win in November.

9. He is free to speak his mind, because he understands he “isn’t responsible for someone else’s reaction” to his opinion.

10. He’s willing to change his mind when he gets new information.

Pirro has not only joined the ranks of Trump’s biggest supporters, but it looks like she’s signed up to be one of his biggest advocates, too.



Every Republican Presidential Candidate Is Hitler
Daniel Greenfield


Obama: Hillary is a Phony, But Vote for Her Anyway
The Point
Daniel Greenfield


The Left’s Plan to Cut Loose a Million Prisoners
Matthew Vadum


Obama Backed Muslim Brotherhood Egypt Coup Against National Security Team Advice
The Point
Daniel Greenfield


"Every Day You Hear That Somebody's Thrown Acid at a Girl's Face"
The Point
Daniel Greenfield


A Hate That Has (Officially) No Name
Stephen Brown


Are DHS Leaders Seeking an MVP Award From ISIS?
Michael Cutler


How U.S. Foreign Policy Made 2015 the “Worst Year in Modern History for Christian Persecution”
Raymond Ibrahim


The Obama Doctrine, Unplugged
Caroline Glick


Getting Rid of H-1B Visas: Easier Said Than Done
Ian Smith


The Mullahs’ Executions Reach Highest Level Since 1989
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh



Inline image 1

Inline image 1

Inline image 1

Inline image 2



A few of these cartoons are destined to be classics!!!!

Great legend for this photo!!!

Here is a potential candidate for "classic" status":

One of my other favorites!!!
                                                                                                                  Another classic?

Thursday, March 17, 2016



Sworn Officers Chose the United Nations Over the US Constitution, then Murdered LeVoy Finicum

United Nations
The MIAC Report
Although the MIAC report is nearly 7 years old, the plan outlined therein seems to be operating quite nicely for our overlords.
MIAC Report
Prelude to Murder
  Let’s shift back to 2016 and further examine the incidents which occurred around the aforementioned Malheur Reservation protest, and all of the ancillary events that surrounded it; specifically, the murder of LeVoy Finicum.

On January 26, 2016, LaVoy Finicum, Ammon Bundy, Ryan Payne and a convoy of fellow protestors were heading to neighboring Grant County to meet with the Sheriff there, Glen Palmer.  Palmer was a vocal supporter of the Ammon Bundy led protest, and is a member of CSPOA.  As recorded by Shauna Payne’s mobile device, the convoy was ambushed by law enforcement and fired upon repeatedly.  Sadly, one of the rounds, a .308, penetrated Mr. Finicum’s heart and ended his life.  However, did LaVoy Finicum need to die that day?  And, more importantly, when did Constitutionally-sworn officers decide to trash their oath and follow the United Nations?
Any time an officer discharges their weapons in the line of duty, there needs to be an “after-incident” report filed.  It may be known as something else where you live, but the premise is the same.  A law enforcement officer needs to explain why they discharged their weapon, in writing and/or an interview.  In the LaVoy Finicum murder, the same process was followed by the officers involved; and the subsequent report of said interviews have fallen into my possession.  I want to thank my good friend, Paul Preston of Agenda 21 Radio, for sharing the documents.

U.N. Hit Squads
     Some of the officers involved in the LaVoy Finicum murder were called into the offices of the Oregon State Police on 31 Jan, 2016 for interviews.  I will include the link to the entire document below, but for purposes of this article I am going to include a brief excerpt to illustrate the outright treason spoken by “Officer 1.”  Officer 1 was asked if he had any information as to what kind of support, or how many supporters, that Ammon Bundy and friends had in the neighboring city of John Day.  The quote below is how he answered (seen on page 111 of the accompanying document):
“I knew going into it that there was a sheriff in Grant County that was supporting the movement, or the ideology behind what they were pushing. I knew that there was a large amount of community members in Grant County that supported their beliefs, and that had similar constitutional beliefs, and to the point of the Grant County making it clear they are a UN Free Zone, and so that knowledge was known to all of us.”  (Emphasis added by me)
Link to Full Officer Testimony Can Be Found BY CLICKING HERE
Is federal law-enforcement beholden to the U.N., or to the US Constitution?  I think that the answer is clear.  I encourage all writers in alternative media to download the PDF of the LaVoy Finicum report linked below, and write your own article based on the information available.  We know that mainstream media will not touch this, so it’s up to all of us.

Before Obama there was virtually no outlandish presence of Islam in America.


• All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools. Christianity and the bible are banned in schools. • All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic prayer in schools, airports and businesses. • All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons. • All of a sudden we are inundated with law suits by Muslims who are offended by American culture. • All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you have no idea who is covered up under them. • All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law. • All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute anyone who engages in “anti-Muslim speech”. • All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS, are emphatically declared they are NOT 
Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like ‘workplace violence." • All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that were benign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood. • All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS. • All of a sudden, America has reduced it’s nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama’s stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted. • All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs. • All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war and sabotage THEY perpetrate 
against our soldiers. • All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 Pre-World War I levels of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter. A further draw down of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress. • All of a sudden 
half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East. • All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states. He demands to close the facility. • All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer. • All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama’s “Syrian refugee” resettlement programs. • All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA.
 • All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting by two Jihadists, is disarm American Citizens.

"By his fruits you will know him." All of a sudden, I am sick to my stomach.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016



This is the first public statement, that I've seen, made by a former classmate, colleague, or employee---amazing, as contentious as this primary has been, that no one has come forth before---
Trump and Ticklin

A personal note from Peter Ticktin who knows Donald Trump from high school:

As a law firm, we at The Ticktin Law Group do not like to get involved in politics. As soon as we endorse one side, we risk alienating everyone on the other side. Also, our lawyers and staff are, themselves, on both sides. Politics is not our game. However, Justice is!
If you saw a guy get publicly smeared, and you knew him well from the days you were friends and seniors together in high school, if you knew him to be a decent and honest man, would you want to say something? This is why I need to share what I know.
I was aghast at watching last night's debate. It was a set-up. The moderators, Cruz, and Rubio were all like little alligators trying to take a bite out of Trump. Yes, Donald Trump has had some failures, but he has been exceedingly successful. None of this came out. Instead, there was a general attack. Rubio simply makes up lies. He pretends that Trump has small hands and makes fun of him for something which isn't even real. He pretends that Donald wets his pants, and makes fun of him, as though it was true, and then he calls Donald Trump a "Bully."
I am not suggesting that you should vote or not vote for anyone. I just need to defend a former friend who is being smeared.

Like Donald Trump, I attended New York Military Academy ("NYMA") for high school. In fact, in our senior year, together, Donald was my captain, and I was his 1st Platoon Sergeant. I sometimes joke that I ran his first company for him, Company "A."
People don't really change much from the ages of 17 and 18, and I know this guy. I know him to be a good decent guy. We lived and breathed an Honor Code in those years. It wasn't just a rule. It was our way of life. Neither Donald, nor any other cadet who graduated with us would ever lie, cheat, or steal from a fellow cadet. These values became irreversibly intertwined in the fabric of our personalities, of who we are.
Of the 99 guys (no girls in those days) in our class, there is not one who I know who has a bad word to say about Donald Trump. Think of it. With all the jealousies which arise in high school and thereafter, with all the potential envy, not one of us has anything other than positive memories of this man. How could we? He was an "A" student, a top athlete, and as a leader, he was highly respected. We never feared him, yet we never wanted to disappoint him. He had our respect. He was never a bigot in any way, shape or form. He only hates those who hate. Of course he denounces the KKK.
As to the discussion with the New York Times, it is his choice to release the 'off the record' remarks. However, if he does, it opens the door for all political opposition to make that demand for everyone, and that means that our press will never get those 'off the record' remarks which help them to understand the realities of the campaign. Moreover, the idea that Donald Trump confessed some alternate theory of his position is preposterous. Can anyone believe that all those NY Times reporters are walking around knowing some deep dark nasty secret about a guy who is seeking an endorsement?
The Republican establishment is afraid of Donald Trump. Why? They are afraid that he will lose to Hillary. They don't hate Donald. They hate her. They are so fearful that they fail to see that by expanding the base of voters for Trump, he is more likely to win.
Watching the chorus of whiners, decriers, denigrators, and self-righteous put-down experts from so many directions, from Mitt Romney, to Megyn Kelly, Little Marco, it has to make you wonder. Why? Why are so many people so angry with Donald Trump, that they are lying, name calling, ridiculing, and demeaning him as they do. Either they are afraid, or they know him to be evil.
This is why I feel the need to speak out at this time. I know this man. He is a lot of things, but he is not evil. He is a decent honest guy who loves this country, and who is willing to sacrifice so much of what is left of his life, because he knows that this country needs to be fixed, and that it is going to require someone who can do the job. He just doesn't see anything around him other than political hacks, so he is willing to take this huge responsibility.
I'm not saying that he is the only one who can do the job. My point is simply as to his motivation and his goodness.
This next decade is going to be one of major changes. We all see the climate changing, and the world food supply is getting lower. Our fish stock around the world is running low. Oil prices will cause countries to fail. The Middle East is beyond repair, and we have become weak and ineffective around the world. Donald Trump sees the issues and knows that he can assemble leaders who would have the best chance of fixing things. This is why he is running. He does not need it for his own aggrandizement. He doesn't need another big jet or to take up residence in the White House. He just wants things to be fixed, and he knows that the politicians won't fix anything.
I knew Donald Trump and was close to him in our senior year in high school. I just want you to know that there is nothing to fear from him. His character is as good as it gets. He is a patriot, taking on a heroic task, and being thanked by massive abuse.
If you want to see a true reflection of a man, look at his children. Need I say more?

Monday, March 14, 2016

Subject: New Yorker Article THE NEW YORKER on Trump

Subject: New Yorker Article 
No matter who your favorite candidate might be ... the article is an interesting read.
The author is the political correspondent for Bloomberg and wrote extensively about Obama even before he was elected.  
" Who is Donald Trump?"   The better question may be, "What is Donald Trump?"   
The answer? A giant middle finger from average Americans to the political and media establishment.
Some Trump supporters are like the 60s white girls who dated black guys just to annoy their parents.  But most Trump supporters have simply had it with the Demo-socialists and the "Republicans In Name Only." [RINO]  They know there isn't a dime's worth of difference between Hillary Rodham and Jeb Bush, and only a few cents worth between Rodham and the other GOP candidates.
Ben Carson is not an "establishment" candidate, but the Clinton machine would pulverize Carson; and the somewhat rebellious Ted Cruz will (justifiably so) be tied up with natural born citizen lawsuits (as might Marco Rubio).  The Trump supporters figure they may as well have some fun tossing Molotov cocktails at Wall Street and Georgetown while they watch the nation collapse.  Besides - lightning might strike, Trump might get elected, and he might actually fix a few things.  Stranger things have happened (the nation elected a neo islamo-]Marxist in 2008)
Millions of conservatives are justifiably furious.  They gave the Republicans control of the House in 2010 and control of the Senate in 2014, and have seen them govern no differently than Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.  Yet those same voters are supposed to trust the GOP in 2016?  Why?
Trump did not come from out of nowhere.  His candidacy was created by the last six years of Republican failures.
No reasonable person can believe that any of the establishment candidates [dems or reps] will slash federal spending, rein in the Federal Reserve, cut burdensome business regulations, reform the tax code, or eliminate useless federal departments (the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, etc.).  Even Ronald Reagan was unable to eliminate the Department of Education.  (Of course, getting shot at tends to make a person less of a risk-taker.)  No reasonable person can believe that any of the nation's major problems will be solved by Rodham, Bush, or the other dishers of donkey fazoo now eagerly eating corn in Iowa and pancakes in New Hampshire .
Many Americans, and especially Trump supporters, have had it with:
·      Anyone named Bush
·      Anyone named Clinton
·      Anyone who has held political office
·      Political correctness
·      Illegal immigration
·      Massive unemployment
·      Phony "official" unemployment and inflation figures
·      Welfare waste and fraud
·      People faking disabilities to go on the dole
·      VA waiting lists
·      TSA airport groping
·      ObamaCare
·      The Federal Reserve's money-printing schemes
·      Wall Street crooks like Jon Corzine
·      Michelle Obama's vacations
·      Michelle Obama's food police
·      Barack Obama's golf
·      Barack Obama's arrogant and condescending lectures
·      Barack Obama's criticism/hatred of America
·      Valerie Jarrett
·      " Holiday trees"
·      Hollywood hypocrites
·      Global warming nonsense
·      Cop killers
·      Gun confiscation threats
·      Stagnant wages
·      Boys in girls' bathrooms
Trump supporters believe that no Democrat wants to address these issues, and that few Republicans have the courage to address these issues.  They certainly know that none of the establishment candidates are better than barely listening to them, and Trump is their way of saying, "Screw you, Hillary Rodham Rove Bush!"  The more the talking head political pundits insult the Trump supporters, the more supporters he gains.  (The only pundits who seem to understand what is going on are Democrats Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell and Republican John LeBoutillier.  All the others argue that the voters will eventually "come to their senses" and support an establishment candidate .)
But America does not need a tune-up at the same old garage.  It needs a new engine installed by experts - and neither Rodham nor Bush are mechanics with the skills or experience to install it.  Hillary Rodham is not a mechanic; she merely manages a garage her philandering husband abandoned.  Jeb Bush is not a mechanic; he merely inherited a garage.  Granted, Trump is also not a mechanic, but he knows where to find the best ones to work in his garage.  He won't hire his brother-in-law or someone to whom he owes a favor; he will hire someone who lives and breathes cars.
"How dare they revolt!" the "elites" are bellowing.  Well, the citizens are daring to revolt, and the RINOs had better get used to it.  "But Trump will hand the election to Clinton !"  That is what the Karl Rove-types want people to believe, just as the leftist media eagerly shoved "Maverick" McCain down GOP throats in 2008 - knowing he would lose to Obama. 
But even if Trump loses and Rodham wins, she would not be dramatically different than Bush or most of his fellow candidates.  They would be nothing more than caretakers, not working to restore America 's greatness, but merely presiding over the collapse of a massively in-debt nation.  A nation can perhaps survive open borders; a nation can perhaps survive a generous welfare system.  But no nation can survive both - and there is little evidence that the establishment candidates of either party understand that.  The United States cannot continue on the path it is on.  At some point it will be destroyed by its debt.
Yes, Trump speaks like a bull wandering through a china shop, but the truth is that the borders do need to be sealed; we cannot afford to feed, house, and clothe 200,000 Syrian immigrants for decades (even if we get inordinately lucky and none of them are ISIS infiltrators or Syed Farook wannabes); the world is at war with radical Islamists.
Is Trump the perfect candidate?  Of course not.  Neither was Ronald Reagan.  But unless we close our borders and restrict immigration, all the other issues are irrelevant.  One terrorist blowing up a bridge or a tunnel could kill thousands.  One jihadist poisoning a city's water supply could kill tens of thousands.  One electromagnetic pulse attack from a single Iranian nuclear device could kill tens of millions.  Faced with those possibilities, most Americans probably don't care that Trump relied on eminent domain to grab up a final quarter acre of property for a hotel, or that he boils the blood of the Muslim Brotherhood thugs running the Council on American-Islamic Relations. 
While Attorney General Loretta Lynch's greatest fear is someone giving a Muslim a dirty look, most Americans are more worried about being gunned down at a shopping mall by a crazed islamic lunatic who treats his prayer mat better than his three wives and who thinks 72 virgins are waiting for him in paradise.
The establishment is frightened to death that Trump will win, but not because they believe he will harm the nation.  They are afraid he will upset their taxpayer-subsidized apple carts.  While Obama threatens to veto legislation that spends too little, they worry that Trump will veto legislation that spends too much.
You can be certain that if an establishment candidate wins in November 2016 ... their cabinet positions will be filled with the same people we've seen before.  The washed-up has-beens of the Clinton and Bush administrations will be back in charge.  The hacks from Goldman Sachs will continue to call the shots.  Whether it is Bush's Karl Rove or Clinton 's John Podesta who makes the decisions in the White House will matter little.
If the establishment wins, America loses.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...