Saturday, July 30, 2016



Uh-oh!, This could be checkmate!, The brain-dead Hitlery supporters are going to hate this video., Bernie’s supporters are abandoning the Democrat Party and are voting for Donald Trump.


H/T Melissa Mastrianni
Awesome! Bernie’s supporters are fired up. They were hosed by the Democrat Party, and they are leaving in droves, many now planning to vote for Donald Trump.
In this video Bernie supporters make some very good points. One young man claimed that Bernie supporters and Trump supporters stand for some of the same things, which is true, especially Plank #1, that the status quo establishment is corrupt and looking out for themselves only, to hell with the people.
Where Trump and Bernie differ is in the solutions to the problems created by the “good ol’ boy” corrupt establishment. While Bernie believes we can tax our way to prosperity and build an even larger, more voracious beast (our federal government) along the way, Trump believes the opposite. He has studied the JFK/Reagan model of lower taxes equals greater incentive within the private sector, thus a burgeoning economy and greater volume of tax revenue, and although it may be counterintuitive, it is historically proven, and The Donald plans to return to this proven fiscal sanity.
It is also Trump’s plan, in strike contrast to Bernie’s, to drastically cut our federal government spending and regulations, to balance the budget finally, and begin the process of shrinking the voracious beast to its intended servile function.

DNC Wikileaks Email Hack Confirms CNN is in Bed With The Democratic Party


CNN sign
Lots of people call CNN the Clinton News Network as a joke but the Wikileaks hack of DNC emails shows there’s truth to that moniker. This leak just became more embarrassing for Democrats and their media allies.
American Thinker reports:
DNC Wikileaks hack reveals CNN in bed with Dems
Another media outlet is busted.
In his piece entitled “DNC Wikileaks hack reveals Politico in bed with Dems,” American Thinker editor Thomas Lifson recently busted an “influential reporter” at Politico for running an article past a Democrat official for review before he submitted it to his Politico editor.
Now, another email made public by Wikileaks documents Jason Seher, Writer/Producer of The Lead with Jake Tapper, coordinating the content of an interview between Tapper and a representative of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Pablo Manriquez (AKA: “Pablo”), DNC Director of Hispanic Media.
The key line, highlighted below, suggests that the interview was scripted to focus on the DNC’s talking points.
Check out this exchange:
Date: 2016-04-28 16:46
Subject: Re: Pablo!
Window closing on this.
Need to know asap if we want to offer Jake Tapper questions to ask us.
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Manriquez, Pablo > wrote:
Lmk and I’ll call Jason. Might wanna loop Freundlich &/or Dillon here to see if there’s any newsworthy oppo Luis can drop
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: “Seher, Jason” >
Date: April 28, 2016 at 1:01:18 PM EDT
To: “” >
Subject: Pablo!
Thanks for facilitating Luis coming on today, and bearing with us through a meelee of GOP nonsense and cancellations and all that.
Any particular points he’ll want to make? We’re gonna stay Dem focused…
Jason Seher | CNN
Writer/Producer | The Lead with Jake Tapper
(202) 772-2640 | (856) 979-8021
Democrats say jump and CNN asks how high.
We knew CNN’s bias was bad, we just didn’t know how bad.

Friday, July 29, 2016

FULL VIDEO, The Clinton Crime Family -, The "Vince" Foster Affair ,

Vincent Walker "Vince" Foster, Jr. (January 15, 1945 – July 20, 1993) was a Deputy White House Counsel during the first few months of President Bill Clinton's administration. Before that he was a partner at Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas and a colleague and friend of Hillary Rodham Clinton. At the White House, he was unhappy with work in politics, and spiraled into depression, leading to his suicide in 1993. His death remains a subject of interest among conspiracy theorists.

Foster's death, occurring just six months into the new administration, is thought by some to have ended the optimism and remaining innocence of the White House staff. White House chief-of-staff and childhood friend Mack McLarty said that "It was a deep cut. It clearly had a tremendous impact."

Fellow White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum felt that if Foster had lived, he would have helped resist the calls to appoint Independent Counsels, and the many investigations lumped under the Whitewater umbrella that occupied the administration and Clinton for the rest of his presidency, might not have happened. As it happened, how Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Margaret Williams, in particular handled Foster's files and documents immediately after his death became an issue of much investigation itself.

The Tangled Clinton Web –, Fox News Reporting, [COMPLETE] ,


VIDEO MUST SEE:, HOT STUFF, TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY, Hillary Adversary Dick Morris Fills in the Gaps in Bill Clinton’s DNC Speech About ‘Meeting a Girl’

Strategist for Bill Clinton’s campaign and — now former — Clinton family friend Dick Morris is out with a response to the former president’s speech on Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention.
Morris says Bill Clinton left a few details out of Mrs. Clinton’s resume.
Among Morris’s bill of particulars were:

  • Worked for a “well known communist law firm” that represented the Black Panthers.
  • Friendship with controversial ‘community organizer’ Saul Alinsky.
  • Got just one bill passed into law during time as Senator.
  • Flunked the District of Columbia bar exam.
  • Having full-time nanny and assistant paid for by taxpayers who took Chelsea to her soccer games.
On the issue of working for “women and children,” Morris chides, “the hell she did.”
His comments certainly seem to be resonating. The video has more than four million views and has been shared more than 300,000 times.

VIDEO:, ‘They have a history of corruption’,: Clinton Cash documentary author Peter Schweizer ,



National Review
Hillary Forgets Herself

The Democratic nominee reintroduces herself, again.
By The Editors -- July 29, 2016
In the hours before their candidate's acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, Hillary Clinton's aides said that she would take the occasion to "reintroduce herself" to the American people. Again. Mrs. Clinton has been a fixture -- an inescapable one -- in American politics for a quarter of a century. She's had more new-and-improved versions than a brand of laundry detergent. She lamented that "there is no other Donald Trump" other than the one with whom we are familiar. There is no other Hillary Rodham Clinton, either.
But if you need a reintroduction to Mrs. Clinton, we will oblige: She is an opportunist without anything resembling a conviction with the exception of her unwavering commitment to abortion, a "public servant" who along with her husband grew vastly wealthy exploiting her political connections and renting access to everybody from Goldman Sachs to Vladimir Putin, a petty, grasping, vindictive, meretricious time-server whose incompetence and dishonesty have been proved everywhere from Little Rock to Benghazi.
Dressed symbolically all in white (as though she were a bride or a monarch enjoying her privilège du blanc), she delivered a speech that was one part It Takes a Village and eleven parts old State of the Union speeches from Barack Obama and her husband. Her presentation was her usual hectoring -- she is not capable of speaking in another mode -- and one of her themes was the superiority of collective action to atomistic individualism, as though she were running against Ayn Rand rather than Donald Trump. She decried "mean rhetoric" and then said that people who operate their businesses in ways that displease her are unpatriotic. She suggested that pillaging high-earning individuals and companies with confiscatory taxes could fund an endless goody bag of patronage for her constituents.
I.e., the usual Hillary.
"My primary mission as president will be to create more opportunity and more good jobs with rising wages right here in the U.S.," she said. That is of course unobjectionable, as indeed was much of what she said -- that's how platitudes work. But five minutes' worth of serious thinking is enough to bring into question whether Mrs. Clinton is even serious about her most vanilla banalities. There is no serious person -- Republican or Democrat -- who believes that the Obama administration and its policies have produced the level of "good jobs with rising wages right here in the U.S." that Mrs. Clinton promises. Even she doesn't believe that, and said as much in her incoherent way: Democrats have failed to address the concerns of "working people" (surely most of us are working people), she avowed, but Barack Obama still doesn't get enough credit in spite of this failure, and she'll do better by doing . . . exactly the same things that Barack Obama promised.
Barack Obama, with his pen and his telephone -- and his solid Democratic majorities during the first years of his presidency -- did not actually do very much to revive American economic dynamism. He poured billions of dollars into pet projects for politically connected firms such as Solyndra and daffy green-energy projects that have not paid off while the ever-more-aggressive regulators under his control have applied something between a foot on the brake and a foot on the neck of the economy. If Mrs. Clinton objected to any of that, she was strangely quiet about it. If she has better ideas, she did not voice any of them. Where has she been since 1992 if not near the levers of power?
It isn't that we expected Hillary Rodham Clinton to trash President Obama as he passed the Democrats' baton to her. But if her platform is to be more of the same, then she should say as much. If her aim is to be a "change maker," as her husband called her, then she owes the voters an explanation of exactly how and why the Obama administration failed to do what she believes it should have done. Blaming congressional Republicans for having different views and nonconforming policy preferences will not do.
She was, of course, mostly maddeningly vague. To the extent that she ventured down from the lofty heights of moral preening and celebrating herself as a semi-divine agent of History, she mostly cleaved to her familiar list of free stuff and a proposal for punitive tax hikes on unpopular individuals, companies, and industries. Maybe there are some rubes out there who think that this will result in tuition-free college for "the middle class," as though shifting around costs made things less expensive. (How's that working out for your health care?) Her strategy on the Islamic State? Same thing we've been doing, but with an added "We will prevail!"
While we do lament the implicit lack of self-respect and individual responsibility underpinning the philosophy of president-as-Santa-Claus, the economic and cultural anxieties of the American public are not the products of political hypochondria. And neither are the national-security concerns that should be weighing heavily in American minds as the Islamic State demonstrates that its reach goes from Syria to France to Orlando and beyond. There is an alarming deficit of genuine leadership in the United States -- and on the world stage -- and the fact that some people have fond memories of the years in which Mrs. Clinton's husband was occupying the Oval Office and bothering the interns isn't much of an argument for investing her with the most powerful political portfolio on Earth.
Her most persuasive argument was that she isn't Donald Trump. His most persuasive argument is the converse, and nothing Mrs. Clinton said on Thursday evening changes that.



Julian Assange Promises "A Lot More Material" Coming on US Election BY: Chris Menahan InformationLiberation


Julian Assange has promised "a lot more material" is coming on the US elections.

Rather than simply dump all the data they've received all at once like they did with the Manning leaks, Wikileaks is following the Greenwald model of releasing it in a slow trickle to completely dominate the news cycle.

This is absolutely spectacular.

From RT:

WikiLeaks possesses “a lot more” documents to surprise American voters ahead of the upcoming presidential elections - and will not hesitate to make them public.
The leak of 20,000 internal emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), published by the whistleblowing website on July 22 “is having so much political impact in the United States,” Julian Assange acknowledged to CNN in a Skype interview on Tuesday.

Speaking to America’s primary media outlet from the safety of Ecuadorian embassy in London, the WikiLeaks founder refused to disclose the source of the leaked batch of DNC emails, particularly avoiding denial or to confirmation of alleged Russian involvement, much talked about by Hillary Clinton’s campaign headquarters. He explained his lack of responsiveness by an obligation to protect WikiLeaks’ information sources.

“Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment. Some people may have egg on their faces,” Assange said. “But to exclude certain actors is to make it easier to find out who our sources are. So we never do it.”
The famous whistleblower said that Hillary Clinton’s aides are focusing public’s attention on the unsubstantiated “Russian trail” in the delicate situation they had found themselves in. This is instead of trying to address the principle issue of the DNC email scandal: roughly plotting against rival Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders. The hacked letters cover the period from January to late May this year.

“What we have right now is the Hillary Clinton campaign using a speculative allegation about hacks that have occurred in the past to try and divert attention from our emails, another separate issue that WikiLeaks has published,” Assange said.

“I think this raises a very serious question, which is that the natural instincts of Hillary Clinton and the people around her, that when confronted with a serious domestic political scandal, that she tries to blame the Russians, blame the Chinese, etc.,” Assange noted.

"If she does that when she’s in government, that’s a political, managerial style that can lead to conflict,” he concluded.
Here's his interview with CNN, it's three minutes straight of a Clinton News Network propagandist spewing the Clinton line Russia was behind the leak and trying to get Assange to say something which can be twisted to support Clinton's "ZOMG Russian conspiracy" narrative.
He doesn't bite.
Yesterday, Wikileaks released some scandalous voice mails showing how Democratic National Committee officials bumped a cancer patient from sitting next to Obama after he was beat out by a bigger donor:

If Trump wins, we need to demand this brave hero be given asylum in the US.

This man is literally wanted for having sex with the Swedish equivalents of Mattress Girl. The initial prosecutor on his case dismissed the rape charges entirely and dropped his arrest warrant. They were only brought back on appeal, no doubt after the "right authorities" applied the "right amount of pressure."

While Swedish authorities will allow their nation to be flooded with rapefugees by the hundreds of thousands and actively cover up their rapes, they want to prosecute Assange on the flimsiest of charges.

Trey Gowdy Just Revealed The Shocking Truth On Why Hillary Wasn’t Indicted


Trey Gowdy Just Revealed The Shocking Truth On Why Hillary Wasn’t Indicted

When FBI Director James Comey recommended no charges to be brought against Hillary Clinton, many Americans were outraged.
Trey Gowdy channeled their outrage in his epic confrontation with Comey when he testified in front of Congress.
And now there’s a video going viral of Gowdy explaining why he believes Clinton dodged charges.
Recently, Gowdy appeared on Fox News Channel’s The Kelly File to discuss his showdown with the FBI Director.
When Comey testified to Congress, Gowdy expressed clear frustration that the FBI director could detail all the ways Clinton lied about her conduct, yet was still able to escape being charged of a crime.
Gowdy was asked during his interview if he thought politics played a role in the outcome of Hillary’s email scandal.
According to the show’s transcript, Gowdy responded:
KELLY: Do you think politics were at play here in his decision?
GOWDY: Boy, the second one is tough, but I’ll tell you why. Yes, I think he’s a straight shooter. I think the exact same thing about Jim Comey that I did this time last week and I will this time next week. I think he’s a straight arrow. We just fundamentally disagree on that element and whether or not he could have proven intent by circumstantial evidence. Did politics influence it? I can tell you based on my previous life, it is always tougher to convict or prosecute someone who is well known.
KELLY: Mm-hmm.
GOWDY: It just is. He might not feel comfortable telling you that, but I will tell you that.
You can watch the video of Gowdy’s interview below.
It’s impossible to not ignore the politics surrounding Hillary’s investigation and the outcome.
Barack Obama endorsed Hillary Clinton to succeed him.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch – who would make the final call on bringing an indictment against Hillary – was appointed to be United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York by Bill Clinton.
And just days before the FBI would announce that charges would not be brought against Clinton, Hillary announced she would possibly keep Loretta Lynch as Attorney General if she won the election.
So was the investigation rigged?
Republican nominee Donald Trump blasted the decision to not indict Hillary as the triumph of politics over justice.
Do you agree with Trey Gowdy – that political motives kept Hillary safe from indictment?
Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.



Thursday, July 28, 2016

If Everything Is So Great, Then Why Do Two-Thirds Of Americans Say The Country Is On The Wrong Track?

If Everything Is So Great, Then Why Do Two-Thirds Of Americans Say The Country Is On The Wrong Track?
Posted: 27 Jul 2016 08:00 PM PDT
Wrong Way - Public DomainAmericans appear to be increasingly pessimistic about the future of America.  According to a Real Clear Politics average of recent polls, 68.9 percent of Americans believe that the country is on the wrong track, and only 23.1 percent of Americans believe that we are headed in the right direction.  But if you have been listening to the endless parade of political speeches at the Democratic and Republican National conventions, you would be tempted to think that the greatest days for the United States are right around the corner.  The politicians keep promising us that better times are coming if we will just make the “correct” choices on election day, but no matter who we send to Washington D.C. things just seem to keep getting worse and worse.  Let’s take a look at just a few of the signs that indicate that our country is going in the wrong direction…
-The rise in violent crime: We haven’t seen crime rise this rapidly in our major cities in a very long time, and according to a report that was just released this week many forms of violent crime are way ahead of where they were at this time last year
A new report published by the Major Cities Chiefs Association said that violent crime – homicides, rapes, robberies, assaults and shootings – is on the rise nationwide.
The troubling results, though just one survey, could provide vindication to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. President Barack Obama has contested Trump’s assertionmade prominently in his nomination acceptance speech last week – that crime is a national epidemic and major problem.
The mid-year violent crime survey, released Monday, shows 307 more homicides so far in 2016, according to data compiled from 51 law enforcement agencies from some of America’s largest cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. There have also been 1,000 more robberies, approximately 2,000 more aggravated assaults, and 600 more nonfatal shootings in 2016 compared to this time in 2015.
-Police officers are being shot at a staggering rate: The number of police officers shot in the United States during the first half of 2016 was up 78 percent compared to the exact same time period last year.
-Mass shootings: In just the past few weeks we have seen the worst mass shooting in U.S. history in Orlando, and there were mass shootings of police in Dallas and in Baton Rouge.
-The U.S. economy continues to crumble: We just learned that orders for durable goods fell again in June, Gallup’s U.S. economic confidence index just hit the lowest level so far this year, and at this moment 43 million Americans are on food stamps.
-The U.S. consumer appears to be increasingly tapped out as the middle class shrinks: Most of the country is living paycheck to paycheck these days.  One recent survey found that 62 percent of all Americans have less than $1,000 in savings, and U.S. News & World Report is reporting that some analysts are projecting that we are heading for a “restaurant recession”…
Analysts are forecasting a “restaurant recession” in the U.S., which is bad news for America’s food and drink establishments and potentially even worse news for the economy at large.
Paul Westra, a senior research analyst at Stifel Financial Corp., said in a research note Tuesday that he’d turned “decidedly bearish” on the restaurant industry, downgrading Stifel’s stance on 11 different restaurant stocks, including Chipotle Mexican Grill, Panera Bread and Cheesecake Factory.
He and his colleagues now “confidently believe” that the weak restaurant consumer spending seen in the second quarter of the year “reflects the start of a U.S. restaurant recession.”
-Business is not booming: The total amount of stuff our businesses have been selling has been declining since mid-2014, and it is being projected that corporate earnings will be down for a fifth consecutive quarter.  Earlier today, we learned that our biggest aircraft manufacturer, Boeing, has reported its first quarterly loss in nearly seven years.
-Government debt continues to explode: The U.S. national debt has hit a staggering 19.4 trillion dollars, and we have added an average of more than 1.1 trillion dollars to the debt since Barack Obama has been in the White House.
-Our politicians just continue to go from bad to worse: If you thought that the Obama years were bad, just wait until you see what Hillary Clinton can do.  The woman that the Democratic Party just nominated for president of the United States is one of the most evil, wicked and corrupt politicians the nation has ever seen.
-Everywhere you look, evil is exploding: The social fabric of our nation is coming apart all around us, and most of our men are hooked on pornography
A 2014 national survey commissioned by the organization found one-third of men ages 18-30 admitted they are either addicted to porn (23 percent) or are unsure if they are addicted (10 percent).
“According to our survey, over one-half (52 percent) of men age 18-30 admit to risking their careers and livelihood by viewing porn at work within the past 3 months,” Hesch told WND. “The numbers are even higher for men ages 31-49, with nearly three-fourths (74 percent) watching porn at work.”
-Sadly, most Americans are way too addicted to entertainment to bother noticing that our nation is rapidly going down the toilet: In America today, millions of people would rather spend endless hours playing video games such as Pokemon Go on their phones rather than getting involved in their communities.  And it is difficult to say that we even have “communities” anymore when most people spend far more time online than in face to face interaction with others.  If you can believe it, one recent survey found that half the population of the United States and Canada uses Facebook at least once a day.
I could go on and on, but hopefully you are getting the point.
The average American spends more than five hours a day watching television, and the television is telling them that everything is going to be just wonderful and that they should go out and vote for Hillary Clinton because she would be the first woman president and that would make history.
Meanwhile, our society is falling apart in literally thousands of different ways, and most Americans know deep inside that our country is deeply, deeply broken.  That is why more than two-thirds of us tell the pollsters that America is on the wrong track.  Virtually all of us know that something is seriously wrong with the United States, even if we can’t always agree on what the solutions should be.
Let us work very hard to wake our fellow Americans up while we still can, because time for turning this country in the right direction is rapidly running out.

Hey Loretta Lynch, Did You Not Notice the DNC’s Clear Violation of Federal Law or Were You Just Ignoring Lawlessness?


So, those who set up the Democratic National Convention, every person involved, and knew about the illegal aliens who would take to the convention stage on Monday evening are guilty of violating federal law.
It appears that the DNC not only violated federal law at their convention, but they did it at least twice.
According to Section 8 US Code 1324:
(A)Any person who—
(i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;

(ii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;

(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;

(iv) encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or


(I) engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
(II) aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
So, the DNC knowingly invited an illegal alien, Francisca, and her daughter Karla to the national convention to push the known criminal Hillary Clinton for president. Not only that, but the daughter acknowledged before a national audience on television that her mother was in the country illegally. That means both mother and daughter, as well as the DNC know that this woman is guilty of violating the laws of our constitutional republic.

What's even more telling about the crimes of Hillary Clinton is that before the mother and daughter took to the stage at the convention, a video was played where the daughter told Clinton that her mother was in the country illegally. Furthermore, Francisca had been issued a deportation letter, which was apparently ignored by Hillary Clinton, as well as the DNC.
However, this is not the only violation of law by the DNC at the convention.
Following Francisca and Karla, another illegal alien named Astrid Silva took to the stage just five minutes later and openly stated, "I came to America illegally with my mother when I was 4-years old.  We crossed the river [Rio Grande] on a raft."

Now, understand, I don't know the history of either of these women. They may have been trying to escape oppression or just looking to make things better for themselves and their families. So, I don't blame them for decisions they've made. However, the DNC is promoting a woman for the office of president that has authority to enforce laws against both women, but under Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah that enforcement has been nothing short of criminal in itself.
So, I ask, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, why are you not prosecuting everyone involved in this crime, including Hillary Clinton? Is it because you are just as corrupt as the rest of them?
By the way, according to the law, those involved face this for each of the women who appeared at the convention:
(B)A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—

(i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;

(ii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

(iii) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

(iv) in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.
Does it appear to anyone reading this that both Hillary Clinton and the DNC have violated the law? Sure, they did not bring the people over the border, but they have sought to give sanctuary to them and even promote their illegal actions as legal by giving them a platform to speak from.
Additionally, I address the unlawful Attorney General because, according to the law, under the authority to arrest, "No officer or person shall have authority to make any arrests for a violation of any provision of this section except officers and employees of the Service designated by the Attorney General, either individually or as a member of a class, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws."
I'm not expecting to see Ms. Lynch take any actions.

VIDEO:, Donald Trump Steals Clinton's DNC Thunder, - Full Press Conference 7/27/16,


THE COMMON SENSE SHOW, Why There Might Not Be An Election-, Mike Adams and Dave Hodges,


Ark Midnight ,- Episode 7, HOST JOHN B. WELLS, Technocracy & Agenda 21 with Debbie Bacigalupi,




By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
July 28, 2016
© 2016
...but defend and cover up DNC emails ridiculing blacks, Latinos and gays
"... I've never seen the news media as a whole sink to this level. They are operating in a cesspool of dirty politics."
During his press conference -- something he reminded reporters Hillary has failed to hold -- presidential hopeful Donald Trump on Wednesday obviously joked that he hoped the Russian would release Hillary Clinton's so-called missing or "scrubbed" email that created a stir in Washington.
The news media are claiming that Trump asked his friend President Vladimir Putin to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, and then release them to the press. "He never said that while I was listening to the press conference," noted Scott Leonardo, a former police intelligence analyst.
"Besides, the New York Times already printed a story before the presser that accused the Russian leader of colluding with GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump," said Leonardo, currently a corporate director of security.
Instead of reporting on the disgusting and embarrassing things said by Democratic Party staff and politicians about Latinos, blacks and others are contained in the emails, the news media are defending the Democrats by not covering the story but instead making up stories about Donald Trump. "I've worked as a police and intelligence officer for more than 35 years," said Capt. Gordon Eisley in New Jersey, "and I've never seen the news media as a whole sink to this level. They are operating in a cesspool of dirty politics."
In the Wednesday press conference at his Doral golf course, Trump is quoted as saying: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing,” he said. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” But he obviously made the statement tongue-in-cheek.
"These news people walk around Washington D.C. and New York City as if they're intellectual giants, they can't tell when someone is joking? Or are they just selective? I know they despise Trump as much as these Democratic Party publicists despised President Ronald Reagan," said Jonathan McNaughton, who served on the national drug task force that was chaired by George H.W. Bush.
The media telephoned so-called unnamed analysts and claimed these said Trump’s call for a nation that considered a rival to actually hack the e-mails of a major U.S. political party or the server of a former secretary of state was as extraordinary as it was unprecedented.
"But right there, they are lying. If there was hacking, it occurred months ago -- perhaps years ago. Hillary's private server no longer exists. Or does it? The true liars are working on her campaign and in the media," said Director Leonardo. "In fact, during the FBI investigation, the American people were told Hillary's private server wasn't hacked by a foreign intelligence service or group. So which is it? Was she hacked or wasn't she hacked? If the Russians do have those emails I do hope they release them before the people I call 'the walking dead' cast their votes for Hillary Clinton," he said to the Conservative Base.
The news media are claiming Russian hackers gave the embarrassing DNC emails to WikiLeaks, which released them last Friday, on the eve of the Democratic Party convention. The part about Wikileaks' Julian Assange releasing the emails is true, but he didn't do it to help Trump, who he dislikes as much as he dislikes Hillary Clinton.
The New York Times reports that when their reporter Katy Tur questioned Trump if he was urging a foreign nation to hack into Clinton’s private email server, and meddle in the U.S. presidential elections, Trump dismissed the question.
“That’s up to the president,” Trump said, shushing her and saying “be quiet — let the president talk to them [the Russians].” Trump also refused reporters' suggestions to call on Putin to not meddle in the U.S. presidential election.
“I’m not going to tell Putin what to do,” Trump told the reporters who many believe had their claws out for Trump. “Why should I tell Putin what to do?”
The Clinton campaign almost immediately accused Trump of encouraging Russian espionage against the United States. No where did they blame the fact that documents were unprotected on Hillary Clinton's private -- and secret server.
As usual in stories about Republicans, the news media went into full frenzy-mode over Trump's statements. But they didn't say a peep about the DNC breaking the law in front of millions of Americans during their own convention.
The Democrats brought two illegal aliens on stage to pander to their far-left base. But these immigrants broke American law. But the DNC also broke the law, according to NewsmaxTV commentator and filmmaker Dennis Michael Lynch. In addition, it’s a felony to harbor two illegal aliens, which is two violations of Section 8 U.S. Code 1324.
"The Clintons and their news media lapdogs are trying to sell people the idea that Trump is hurting national security when it's both Bill and Hillary who sold out the nation for a bunch of speaking fees from foreign governments who wanted U.S. taxpayer money or military weapons and equipment," said Paul De La Rosa, a former military intelligence officer, now a private security manager. "And are the media looking into crimes committed by a political party knee-deep in corruption. Not during this election cycle," he added.
Appearing on the NewsmaxTV program, the Steve Malzberg Show, Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft appeared to discuss other emails that are just as revealing as the Wasserman Schultz Internet comments. Jim Hoft is active in the Tea Party and was the associate producer of Hating Breitbart.
Holt discussed a list he had compiled and said the work was done by supporters of both Democrat Bernie Sanders and Republican Donald Trump.
The list included:
DNC member killing horses for insurance money.
DNC making fun of a black woman's name.
DNC telling each other, “I love you too. no homo.”
DNC requesting a pull on an MSNBC commentary segment.
DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.
DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with Reuters.
DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.
DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a “rigged system.”
DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment.

Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters. Paid shills.
According to Hoft, Malzberg and others, these emails are not the last that will be released. As reported in the Conservative Base, when asked about why Assange dislikes Mrs. Clinton so much, he noted: "She’s a war hawk with bad judgement who gets an unseemly emotional rush out of killing people."
Please, click on "Mass E-mailing" below and send this article to all your friends.
© 2016 NWV - All Rights Reserved
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...